polytope
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Belmont (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Education (0.68)
- Leisure & Entertainment (0.68)
- Information Technology > Game Theory (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.68)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Education (0.68)
- Leisure & Entertainment (0.68)
- Information Technology > Game Theory (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.68)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.14)
- South America > Paraguay > Asunción > Asunción (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria > Catanzaro Province > Catanzaro (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado > Boulder County > Boulder (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
Provable Editing of Deep Neural Networks using Parametric Linear Relaxation
Ensuring that a DNN satisfies a desired property is critical when deploying DNNs in safety-critical applications. There are efficient methods that can verify whether a DNN satisfies a property, as seen in the annual DNN verification competition (VNN-COMP). However, the problem of provably editing a DNN to satisfy a property remains challenging.
Sampling from Structured Log-Concave Distributions via a Soft-Threshold Dikin Walk
Interest in this problem derives from its applications to Bayesian inference and differential privacy. We present a generalization of the Dikin walk to this setting that requires at most $O((md + d L^2 R^2) \times md^{\omega-1} \log(\frac{w}{\delta}))$ arithmetic operations to sample from $\pi$ within error $\delta> 0$ in the total variation distance from a $w$-warm start. Here $L$ is the Lipschitz constant of $f$, $K$ is contained in a ball of radius $R$ and contains a ball of smaller radius $r$, and $\omega \approx 2.37$ is the matrix-multiplication constant. This improves on the running time of prior works for a range of structured settings important for the aforementioned inference and privacy applications. Technically, we depart from previous Dikin walks by adding a soft-threshold regularizer derived from the Lipschitz or smoothness properties of $f$ to a barrier function for $K$ that allows our version of the Dikin walk to propose updates that have a high Metropolis acceptance ratio for $f$, while at the same time remaining inside the polytope $K$.
Learning convex polytopes with margin
We present improved algorithm for properly learning convex polytopes in the realizable PAC setting from data with a margin. Our learning algorithm constructs a consistent polytope as an intersection of about t log t halfspaces with margins in time polynomial in t (where t is the number of halfspaces forming an optimal polytope). We also identify distinct generalizations of the notion of margin from hyperplanes to polytopes and investigate how they relate geometrically; this result may be of interest beyond the learning setting.