player 2
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Asia > China > Jiangsu Province > Nanjing (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.93)
- Information Technology > Game Theory (0.93)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.15)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Baltimore (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > Oregon (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
Dominated Actions in Imperfect-Information Games
Dominance is a fundamental concept in game theory. In normal-form games dominated strategies can be identified in polynomial time. As a consequence, iterative removal of dominated strategies can be performed efficiently as a preprocessing step for reducing the size of a game before computing a Nash equilibrium. For imperfect-information games in extensive form, we could convert the game to normal form and then iteratively remove dominated strategies in the same way; however, this conversion may cause an exponential blowup in game size. In this paper we define and study the concept of dominated actions in imperfect-information games. Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm for determining whether an action is dominated (strictly or weakly) by any mixed strategy in n-player games, which can be extended to an algorithm for iteratively removing dominated actions. This allows us to efficiently reduce the size of the game tree as a preprocessing step for Nash equilibrium computation. We explore the role of dominated actions empirically in "All In or Fold" No-Limit Texas Hold'em poker.
- North America > United States > Texas (0.24)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Workflow (0.55)
- Research Report (0.50)
- Asia > Taiwan (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Baltimore (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta (0.14)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.05)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- (2 more...)