The driving environment perception has a vital role for autonomous driving and nowadays has been actively explored for its realization. The research community and relevant stakeholders necessitate the development of Deep Learning (DL) models and AI-enabled solutions to enhance autonomous vehicles (AVs) for smart mobility. There is a need to develop a model that accurately perceives multiple objects on the road and predicts the driver's perception to control the car's movements. This article proposes a novel utility-based analytical model that enables perception systems of AVs to understand the driving environment. The article consists of modules: acquiring a custom dataset having distinctive objects, i.e., motorcyclists, rickshaws, etc; a DL-based model (YOLOv8s) for object detection; and a module to measure the utility of perception service from the performance values of trained model instances. The perception model is validated based on the object detection task, and its process is benchmarked by state-of-the-art deep learning models' performance metrics from the nuScense dataset. The experimental results show three best-performing YOLOv8s instances based on mAP@0.5 values, i.e., SGD-based (0.832), Adam-based (0.810), and AdamW-based (0.822). However, the AdamW-based model (i.e., car: 0.921, motorcyclist: 0.899, truck: 0.793, etc.) still outperforms the SGD-based model (i.e., car: 0.915, motorcyclist: 0.892, truck: 0.781, etc.) because it has better class-level performance values, confirmed by the proposed perception model. We validate that the proposed function is capable of finding the right perception for AVs. The results above encourage using the proposed perception model to evaluate the utility of learning models and determine the appropriate perception for AVs.

Successive Halving is a popular algorithm for hyperparameter optimization which allocates exponentially more resources to promising candidates. However, the algorithm typically relies on intermediate performance values to make resource allocation decisions, which can cause it to prematurely prune slow starters that would eventually become the best candidate. We investigate whether guiding Successive Halving with learning curve predictions based on Latent Kronecker Gaussian Processes can overcome this limitation. In a large-scale empirical study involving different neural network architectures and a click prediction dataset, we compare this predictive approach to the standard approach based on current performance values. Our experiments show that, although the predictive approach achieves competitive performance, it is not Pareto optimal compared to investing more resources into the standard approach, because it requires fully observed learning curves as training data. However, this downside could be mitigated by leveraging existing learning curve data.

Reliable data is a cornerstone of modern organizational systems. A notable data integrity challenge stems from label bias, which refers to systematic errors in a label, a covariate that is central to a quantitative analysis, such that its quality differs across social groups. This type of bias has been conceptually and empirically explored and is widely recognized as a pressing issue across critical domains. However, effective methodologies for addressing it remain scarce. In this work, we propose Decoupled Confident Learning (DeCoLe), a principled machine learning based framework specifically designed to detect mislabeled instances in datasets affected by label bias, enabling bias aware mislabelling detection and facilitating data quality improvement. We theoretically justify the effectiveness of DeCoLe and evaluate its performance in the impactful context of hate speech detection, a domain where label bias is a well documented challenge. Empirical results demonstrate that DeCoLe excels at bias aware mislabeling detection, consistently outperforming alternative approaches for label error detection. Our work identifies and addresses the challenge of bias aware mislabeling detection and offers guidance on how DeCoLe can be integrated into organizational data management practices as a powerful tool to enhance data reliability.

Experimental evaluation is crucial in AI research, especially for assessing algorithms across diverse tasks. Many studies often evaluate a limited set of algorithms, failing to fully understand their strengths and weaknesses within a comprehensive portfolio. This paper introduces an Item Response Theory (IRT) based analysis tool for algorithm portfolio evaluation called AIRT-Module. Traditionally used in educational psychometrics, IRT models test question difficulty and student ability using responses to test questions. Adapting IRT to algorithm evaluation, the AIRT-Module contains a Shiny web application and the R package airt. AIRT-Module uses algorithm performance measures to compute anomalousness, consistency, and difficulty limits for an algorithm and the difficulty of test instances. The strengths and weaknesses of algorithms are visualised using the difficulty spectrum of the test instances. AIRT-Module offers a detailed understanding of algorithm capabilities across varied test instances, thus enhancing comprehensive AI method assessment. It is available at https://sevvandi.shinyapps.io/AIRT/ .

The rapidly advancing fields of statistical modeling and machine learning have significantly enhanced data-driven design and optimization. This paper focuses on leveraging these design algorithms to optimize a medical walker, an integral part of gait rehabilitation and physiological therapy of the lower extremities. To achieve the desirable qualities of a walker, we train a predictive machine-learning model to identify trade-offs between performance objectives, thus enabling the use of efficient optimization algorithms. To do this, we use an Automated Machine Learning model utilizing a stacked-ensemble approach shown to outperform traditional ML models. However, training a predictive model requires vast amounts of data for accuracy. Due to limited publicly available walker designs, this paper presents a dataset of more than 5,000 parametric walker designs with performance values to assess mass, structural integrity, and stability. These performance values include displacement vectors for the given load case, stress coefficients, mass, and other physical properties. We also introduce a novel method of systematically calculating the stability index of a walker. We use MultiObjective Counterfactuals for Design (MCD), a novel genetic-based optimization algorithm, to explore the diverse 16-dimensional design space and search for high-performing designs based on numerous objectives. This paper presents potential walker designs that demonstrate up to a 30% mass reduction while increasing structural stability and integrity. This work takes a step toward the improved development of assistive mobility devices.

Generative adversarial networks (GAN) have recently been used for a design synthesis of mechanical shapes. A GAN sometimes outputs physically unreasonable shapes. For example, when a GAN model is trained to output airfoil shapes that indicate required aerodynamic performance, significant errors occur in the performance values. This is because the GAN model only considers data but does not consider the aerodynamic equations that lie under the data. This paper proposes the physics-guided training of the GAN model to guide the model to learn physical validity. Physical validity is computed using general-purpose software located outside the neural network model. Such general-purpose software cannot be used in physics-informed neural network frameworks, because physical equations must be implemented inside the neural network models. Additionally, a limitation of generative models is that the output data are similar to the training data and cannot generate completely new shapes. However, because the proposed model is guided by a physical model and does not use a training dataset, it can generate completely new shapes. Numerical experiments show that the proposed model drastically improves the accuracy. Moreover, the output shapes differ from those of the training dataset but still satisfy the physical validity, overcoming the limitations of existing GAN models.

With the advancement of DNNs into safety-critical applications, testing approaches for such models have gained more attention. A current direction is the search for and identification of systematic weaknesses that put safety assumptions based on average performance values at risk. Such weaknesses can take on the form of (semantically coherent) subsets or areas in the input space where a DNN performs systematically worse than its expected average. However, it is non-trivial to attribute the reason for such observed low performances to the specific semantic features that describe the subset. For instance, inhomogeneities within the data w.r.t. other (non-considered) attributes might distort results. However, taking into account all (available) attributes and their interaction is often computationally highly expensive. Inspired by counterfactual explanations, we propose an effective and computationally cheap algorithm to validate the semantic attribution of existing subsets, i.e., to check whether the identified attribute is likely to have caused the degraded performance. We demonstrate this approach on an example from the autonomous driving domain using highly annotated simulated data, where we show for a semantic segmentation model that (i) performance differences among the different pedestrian assets exist, but (ii) only in some cases is the asset type itself the reason for this reduction in the performance.

The design of induction machine is a challenging task due to different electromagnetic and thermal constraints. Quick estimation of machine's dimensions is important in the sales tool to provide quick quotations to customers based on specific requirements. The key part of this process is to select different design parameters like length, diameter, tooth tip height and winding turns to achieve certain torque, current and temperature of the machine. Electrical machine designers, with their experience know how to alter different machine design parameters to achieve a customer specific operation requirements. We propose a reinforcement learning algorithm to design a customised induction motor. The neural network model is trained off-line by simulating different instances of of electrical machine design game with a reward or penalty function when a good or bad design choice is made. The results demonstrate that the suggested method automates electrical machine design without applying any human engineering knowledge.

Monitoring machine learning systems post deployment is critical to ensure the reliability of the systems. Particularly importance is the problem of monitoring the performance of machine learning systems across all the data subgroups (subpopulations). In practice, this process could be prohibitively expensive as the number of data subgroups grows exponentially with the number of input features, and the process of labelling data to evaluate each subgroup's performance is costly. In this paper, we propose an efficient framework for monitoring subgroup performance of machine learning systems. Specifically, we aim to find the data subgroup with the worst performance using a limited number of labeled data. We mathematically formulate this problem as an optimization problem with an expensive black-box objective function, and then suggest to use Bayesian optimization to solve this problem. Our experimental results on various real-world datasets and machine learning systems show that our proposed framework can retrieve the worst-performing data subgroup effectively and efficiently.

This article emphasizes that NLP as a science seeks to make inferences about the performance effects that result from applying one method (compared to another method) in the processing of natural language. Yet NLP research in practice usually does not achieve this goal: In NLP research articles, typically only a few models are compared. Each model results from a specific procedural pipeline (here named processing system) that is composed of a specific collection of methods that are used in preprocessing, pretraining, hyperparameter tuning, and training on the target task. To make generalizing inferences about the performance effect that is caused by applying some method A vs. another method B, it is not sufficient to compare a few specific models that are produced by a few specific (probably incomparable) processing systems. Rather, the following procedure would allow drawing inferences about methods' performance effects: A population of processing systems that researchers seek to infer to has to be defined. A random sample of processing systems from this population is drawn.