Goto

Collaborating Authors

 pendulum


cf9a242b70f45317ffd281241fa66502-AuthorFeedback.pdf

Neural Information Processing Systems

We thank the reviewers for their close reading of the paper and helpful feedback. Forexample, one can use thedensity ratio estimates7 provided by DualDICE to modify (importance-weight) the off-policy data distribution before passing it to a policy8 gradient orQ-learning method. The figures are overall too small... In Figure 2 the x axis label is missing. The x-axis is training step.


Hamiltonian

Neural Information Processing Systems

See Appendix Aforanoteontrain/testsplitfor Task 3. loss Testloss Energy Baseline HNNBaseline HNNBaseline HNN mass-spring170 20.38 .1 pendulum 42 10 25 5 pendulum 390 7 14 5 (6.3e4 3e4 39 5 pendulum.3





ThetraininglossofCOMETis L= s ˆ s

Neural Information Processing Systems

However,inpractice, we did not find both effects inthe training. The last term in the loss function of COMET does not need the information from the dataset. This section contains the experiment details for cases tested in section 4. In section 4, there are 6 simple experiments performed todemonstrate the capability ofCOMET:(1) mass-spring, (2) 2D Case5: 2Dnonlinear spring.Weconsider acaseofamotion ofanobjectofmassm=1in2D where it is connected to the origin with a nonlinear spring with forceF = |r|2r where r is the position of the object in 2D coordinate. The constants of motion of this systems are the energy and the angular momentum,whichmakesnc=2. Case 6: Lotka-Volterraequation isanordinary differential equation modelling thepopulation of predatorandprey. The training loss in this case was composed of the reconstruction loss and the dynamics loss.