The European Commission claims that Google boosted its own apps and products to the top of search rankings to the detriment of its competitors. The European Commission has levied a $1 billion penalty against Google over alleged competition law violations. An EC investigation found that Google had abused its dominance in the European Union's search and app store markets to funnel people toward its own apps and services, in violation of the EU's Digital Markets Act . The body has ordered Google to refrain from giving preferential treatment to its own services--such as shopping, accommodations, transport, and flights--in search rankings. Google must also allow app developers to communicate and transact with users outside the Play Store, where it takes a commission on sales .

The European Union has fined Google 890 million euros ($1bn), saying the technology giant broke digital antitrust rules by steering users of Google Play and its search engine towards its own services and apps at the expense of rivals. Thursday's penalty is the latest in Brussels' crackdown on Big Tech, which has seen the bloc lead the world in reining in the largest firms from Silicon Valley to Beijing. The European Commission, the bloc's executive branch, said it was acting in the interest of consumers. "The best products should succeed because they're better, not because they're owned by the company running the search engine. And European consumers have a right to be told by app developers where to sign up to the best offers, even when the app store owner does not get a cut," said Teresa Ribera, the commission's executive vice president for clean, just and competitive transition.

Penalty Shootouts: Is the Team That Kicks First More Likely to Win? Penalty kicks are already proving critical to big wins at this year's World Cup. But the advantage in penalty kicks has more to do with psychological effects than who kicks first. A penalty kick during the Netherlands' round of 32 match against Morocco. In a World Cup, some of the most important matches are decided by a penalty shootout. When that moment comes, the captains want to win the coin toss to decide the order of the kicks.

Federated learning (FL) is an effective and widely used approach to training deep learning models on decentralized datasets held by distinct clients. FL also strengthens both security and privacy protections for training data. Common challenges associated with statistical heterogeneity between distributed datasets have spurred significant interest in personalized FL (pFL) methods, where models combine aspects of global learning with local modeling specific to each client's unique characteristics. This work investigates the efficacy of theoretically supported, adaptive MMD measures in pFL, primarily focusing on the Ditto framework, a state-ofthe-art technique for distributed data heterogeneity. The use of such measures significantly improves model performance across a variety of tasks, especially those with pronounced feature heterogeneity. Additional experiments demonstrate that such measures are directly applicable to other pFL techniques and yield similar improvements across a number of datasets. Finally, the results motivate the use of constraints tailored to the various kinds of heterogeneity expected in FL systems.

Regulatory frameworks, such as the EUAIAct, encourage openness of generalpurpose AI models by offering legal exemptions for "open-source" models. Despite this legislative attention on openness, the definition of open-source foundation models remains ambiguous.

This paper studies the information gap between mixture detection and label recovery in binomial logistic mixtures. Standard likelihood-based criteria such as the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) can detect the presence of two components, but this does not guarantee that the corresponding labels are recoverable. We show that this gap is intrinsic to binomial logistic mixtures with a fixed number of trials: observed-data evidence for mixture structure and per-observation information for label recovery have different local orders in the component separation, and only the former accumulates with the sample size. As a result, there exists a detectable-but-unrecoverable regime in which BIC selects two components while the posterior labels remain essentially uninformative. To address this issue, we propose two feasibility-aware inference procedures: a recoverability-aware BIC with a posterior-entropy penalty and an entropy-regularized estimator that mitigates the tendency of the maximum likelihood estimator to produce overly separated components and overly concentrated posterior responsibilities. Numerical experiments confirm the predicted gap and demonstrate that the proposed methods avoid misleading component selections and improve the calibration of posterior label probabilities.

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning not only enhances large language model performance but also provides critical insights into decision-making processes, marking it as a useful tool for monitoring model intent and planning. However, recent works have shown that banning the mention of a specific example of reward hacking causes obfuscation of the undesired reasoning traces but the persistence of the undesired behavior, threatening the reliability of CoT monitoring. We provide an extension to these results with regard to the ability of models to learn a specific type of obfuscated reasoning: steganography. First, we show that penalizing the use of specific strings within load-bearing reasoning traces causes models to substitute alternative strings. Crucially, this does not alter the underlying method by which the model performs the task, demonstrating that the model can learn to steganographically encode its reasoning. We further demonstrate that models can generalize an encoding scheme. When the penalized strings belong to an overarching class, the model learns not only to substitute strings seen in training, but also develops a general encoding scheme for all members of the class which it can apply to held-out testing strings.

Recent large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive reasoning but often overthink, generating excessively long responses that hinder efficiency. We introduce DIET (DIfficulty-AwarETraining), a framework that systematically cuts these "token calories" by integrating on-the-fly problem difficulty into the reinforcement learning (RL) process. DIETdynamically adapts token compression strategies by modulating token penalty strength and conditioning target lengths on estimated task difficulty, to optimize the performance-efficiency trade-off. We also theoretically analyze the pitfalls of naive reward weighting in group-normalized RL algorithms like GRPO, and propose Advantage Weighting technique, which enables stable and effective implementation of these difficulty-aware objectives. Experimental results demonstrate that DIETsignificantly reduces token counts while simultaneously improving reasoning performance. Beyond raw token reduction, we show two crucial benefits largely overlooked by prior work: (1) DIET leads to superior inference scaling. By maintaining high per-sample quality with fewer tokens, it enables better scaling performance via majority voting with more samples under fixed computational budgets, an area where other methods falter.

The authors would like to thank Ulrich-Michael, Frances, James, Maryam, and Mandolyn for their help in labeling the dataset. The work at the Université de Montréal was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (Paull), an NSERCPGS DScholarship (Morin) and an FRQNT Doctoral Scholarship (Morin). Moreover, this research was enabled in part by compute resources provided by Mila (mila.quebec). The work at the University of Freiburg was funded by an academic grant from NVIDIA. The work at the University of Oxford was supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship (Fallon, Kassab), a Sellafield Robotics and AICentre of Excellence Grant, and EPSRCC2CGrant EP/Z531212/1 (Mattamala), and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT)(No.

NBA Finals ratings surge as the league welcomes Trump, drops woke messaging -- but is it sustainable? Netflix film chief says they won't work with directors who want to release movies in theaters Disney's Star Wars relaunch crumbles as'Mandalorian and Grogu' crashes at the box office Education Secretary Linda McMahon rips California trans athlete'compromise,' tells Newsom to'pick a side' Jimmy Kimmel says he felt'defeated' after Colbert show was cancelled, says CBS is using'made-up numbers' Here's how the CDC tried to use bad science to convince people to wear masks during COVID'The Mandalorian and Grogu' is a prime example that Disney's Star Wars is on life support'Supergirl' pre-release tracking looks disastrously bad for Hollywood after lead actress' bizarre comments Trump praised for having'lots of energy' ahead of 80th birthday Trump calls Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner a'thug' Charter Space founder responds to critics' worries about SpaceX impact on market Rep. Byron Donalds shares his faith redemption story amid Florida gubernatorial run Iran's foreign minister says peace with US'has never been closer' GOP lawmaker says it's'really important' that US continues cartel crackdown Spencer Pratt's use of AI to boost campaign sparks debate FBI arrests first suspect on'most wanted fraudsters' list Accused Charlie Kirk killer's attorneys seek to BLOCK death penalty Kayleigh McEnany: Capitalism isn't the big evil Bernie Sanders would have you believe OutKick Analysis NBA needs to incorporate'mistaken identity' rule from FIFA World Cup to stop the flopping issue The World Cup's use of the rule offers a blueprint for real-time consequences INSTANT REACTION FIFA World Cup Now reacts to USA's 4-1 dominant win over Paraguay Melissa Ortiz, Peter Crouch, Sacha Kljestan, Bob Bradley, Stu Holden, Brad Guzan and Mo Edu react to USA's 4-1 win over Paraguay. Flopping is a major issue in the NBA. I've written about it ad nauseam. The league has anti-flopping measures in place, but they rarely dish out fines based on reviews after the conclusion of the games, and in-game flopping calls are even more of rarity.