In this paper, we investigate how to push the performance limits of serving Deep Neural Network (DNN) models on CPU-based servers. Specifically, we observe that while intra-operator parallelism across multiple threads is an effective way to reduce inference latency, it provides diminishing returns. Our primary insight is that instead of running a single instance of a model with all available threads on a server, running multiple instances each with smaller batch sizes and fewer threads for intra-op parallelism can provide lower inference latency. However, the right configuration is hard to determine manually since it is workload- (DNN model and batch size used by the serving system) and deployment-dependent (number of CPU cores on server). We present Packrat, a new serving system for online inference that given a model and batch size ($B$) algorithmically picks the optimal number of instances ($i$), the number of threads each should be allocated ($t$), and the batch sizes each should operate on ($b$) that minimizes latency. Packrat is built as an extension to TorchServe and supports online reconfigurations to avoid serving downtime. Averaged across a range of batch sizes, Packrat improves inference latency by 1.43$\times$ to 1.83$\times$ on a range of commonly used DNNs.

Purpose: When a learner fails to reach a milestone, educators often wonder if there had been any warning signs that could have allowed them to intervene sooner. Machine learning can predict which students are at risk of failing a high-stakes certification exam. If predictions can be made well in advance of the exam, then educators can meaningfully intervene before students take the exam to reduce the chances of a failing score. Methods: Using already-collected, first-year student assessment data from five cohorts in a Master of Physician Assistant Studies program, the authors implement an "adaptive minimum match" version of the k-nearest neighbors algorithm (AMMKNN), using changing numbers of neighbors to predict each student's future exam scores on the Physician Assistant National Certifying Examination (PANCE). Validation occurred in two ways: Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and evaluating the predictions in a new cohort. Results: AMMKNN achieved an accuracy of 93% in LOOCV. AMMKNN generates a predicted PANCE score for each student, one year before they are scheduled to take the exam. Students can then be classified into extra support, optional extra support, or no extra support groups. The educator then has one year to provide the appropriate customized support to each category of student. Conclusions: Predictive analytics can identify at-risk students, so they can receive additional support or remediation when preparing for high-stakes certification exams. Educators can use the included methods and code to generate predicted test outcomes for students. The authors recommend that educators use this or similar predictive methods responsibly and transparently, as one of many tools used to support students.