Goto

Collaborating Authors

 p2pl


Peer-to-Peer Learning + Consensus with Non-IID Data

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Peer-to-peer deep learning algorithms are enabling distributed edge devices to collaboratively train deep neural networks without exchanging raw training data or relying on a central server. Peer-to-Peer Learning (P2PL) and other algorithms based on Distributed Local-Update Stochastic/mini-batch Gradient Descent (local DSGD) rely on interleaving epochs of training with distributed consensus steps. This process leads to model parameter drift/divergence amongst participating devices in both IID and non-IID settings. We observe that model drift results in significant oscillations in test performance evaluated after local training and consensus phases. We then identify factors that amplify performance oscillations and demonstrate that our novel approach, P2PL with Affinity, dampens test performance oscillations in non-IID settings without incurring any additional communication cost.


Peer-to-Peer Deep Learning for Beyond-5G IoT

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We present P2PL, a practical multi-device peer-to-peer deep learning algorithm that, unlike the federated learning paradigm, does not require coordination from edge servers or the cloud. This makes P2PL well-suited for the sheer scale of beyond-5G computing environments like smart cities that otherwise create range, latency, bandwidth, and single point of failure issues for federated approaches. P2PL introduces max norm synchronization to catalyze training, retains on-device deep model training to preserve privacy, and leverages local inter-device communication to implement distributed consensus. Each device iteratively alternates between two phases: 1) on-device learning and 2) distributed cooperation where they combine model parameters with nearby devices. We empirically show that all participating devices achieve the same test performance attained by federated and centralized training -- even with 100 devices and relaxed singly stochastic consensus weights. We extend these experimental results to settings with diverse network topologies, sparse and intermittent communication, and non-IID data distributions.