We propose adaptive, line search-free second-order methods with optimal rate of convergence for solving convex-concave min-max problems. By means of an adaptive step size, our algorithms feature a simple update rule that requires solving only one linear system per iteration, eliminating the need for line search or backtracking mechanisms. Specifically, we base our algorithms on the optimistic method and appropriately combine it with second-order information. Moreover, distinct from common adaptive schemes, we define the step size recursively as a function of the gradient norm and the prediction error in the optimistic update. We first analyze a variant where the step size requires knowledge of the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. Under the additional assumption of Lipschitz continuous gradients, we further design a parameter-free version by tracking the Hessian Lipschitz constant locally and ensuring the iterates remain bounded. We also evaluate the practical performance of our algorithm by comparing it to existing second-order algorithms for minimax optimization.

The optimistic gradient method has seen increasing popularity as an efficient first-order method for solving convex-concave saddle point problems. To analyze its iteration complexity, a recent work [arXiv:1901.08511] proposed an interesting perspective that interprets the optimistic gradient method as an approximation to the proximal point method. In this paper, we follow this approach and distill the underlying idea of optimism to propose a generalized optimistic method, which encompasses the optimistic gradient method as a special case. Our general framework can handle constrained saddle point problems with composite objective functions and can work with arbitrary norms with compatible Bregman distances. Moreover, we also develop an adaptive line search scheme to select the stepsizes without knowledge of the smoothness coefficients. We instantiate our method with first-order, second-order and higher-order oracles and give sharp global iteration complexity bounds. When the objective function is convex-concave, we show that the averaged iterates of our $p$-th-order method ($p\geq 1$) converge at a rate of $\mathcal{O}(1/N^\frac{p+1}{2})$. When the objective function is further strongly-convex-strongly-concave, we prove a complexity bound of $\mathcal{O}(\frac{L_1}{\mu}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ for our first-order method and a bound of $\mathcal{O}((L_p D^\frac{p-1}{2}/\mu)^{\frac{2}{p+1}}+\log\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ for our $p$-th-order method ($p\geq 2$) respectively, where $L_p$ ($p\geq 1$) is the Lipschitz constant of the $p$-th-order derivative, $\mu$ is the strongly-convex parameter, and $D$ is the initial Bregman distance to the saddle point. Moreover, our line search scheme provably only requires an almost constant number of calls to a subproblem solver per iteration on average, making our first-order and second-order methods particularly amenable to implementation.

Contract bridge is an example of an incomplete information game for which computers typically do not perform better than expert human bridge players. In particular, the typical bidding decisions of human bridge players are difficult to mimic with a computer program, and thus automatic bridge bidding remains to be a challenging research problem. Currently, the possibility of automatic bidding without mimicking human players has not been fully studied. In this work, we take an initiative to study such a possibility for the specific problem of bidding without competition. We propose a novel learning framework to let a computer program learn its own bidding decisions. The framework transforms the bidding problem into a learning problem, and then solves the problem with a carefully designed model that consists of cost-sensitive classifiers and upper-confidence-bound algorithms. We validate the proposed model and find that it performs competitively to the champion computer bridge program that mimics human bidding decisions.