We describe PromptBoosting, a query-efficient procedure for building a text classifier from a neural language model (LM) without access to the LM's parameters, gradients, or hidden representations. This form of "black-box" classifier training has become increasingly important as the cost of training and inference in large-scale LMs grows. But existing black-box LM classifier learning approaches are themselves computationally inefficient, typically specializing LMs to the target task by searching in a large space of (discrete or continuous) prompts using zeroth-order optimization methods. Instead of directly optimizing in prompt space, PromptBoosting obtains a small pool of prompts via a gradient-free approach and then constructs a large pool of weak learners by pairing these prompts with different elements of the LM's output distribution. These weak learners are then ensembled using the AdaBoost algorithm. The entire learning process requires only a small number of forward passes and no backward pass. Experiments show that PromptBoosting achieves state-of-the-art performance in multiple black-box few-shot classification tasks, and matches or outperforms full fine-tuning in both few-shot and standard learning paradigms, while training 10x faster than existing black-box methods.

Nowadays, malware and malware incidents are increasing daily, even with various anti-viruses systems and malware detection or classification methodologies. Many static, dynamic, and hybrid techniques have been presented to detect malware and classify them into malware families. Dynamic and hybrid malware classification methods have advantages over static malware classification methods by being highly efficient. Since it is difficult to mask malware behavior while executing than its underlying code in static malware classification, machine learning techniques have been the main focus of the security experts to detect malware and determine their families dynamically. The rapid increase of malware also brings the necessity of recent and updated datasets of malicious software. We introduce two new, updated datasets in this work: One with 9,795 samples obtained and compiled from VirusSamples and the one with 14,616 samples from VirusShare. This paper also analyzes multi-class malware classification performance of the balanced and imbalanced version of these two datasets by using Histogram-based gradient boosting, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and XGBoost models with API call-based dynamic malware classification. Results show that Support Vector Machine, achieves the highest score of 94% in the imbalanced VirusSample dataset, whereas the same model has 91% accuracy in the balanced VirusSample dataset. While XGBoost, one of the most common gradient boosting-based models, achieves the highest score of 90% and 80%.in both versions of the VirusShare dataset. This paper also presents the baseline results of VirusShare and VirusSample datasets by using the four most widely known machine learning techniques in dynamic malware classification literature. We believe that these two datasets and baseline results enable researchers in this field to test and validate their methods and approaches.