Towns and cities are currently equipping themselves with a host of connected devices, with a view to transforming themselves into ''smart cities''. To manage this mass of connected objects, autonomous software entities, known as agents, can be attached to them to cooperate and use these devices to offer personalized services. However, this object infrastructure needs to be semantically structured in order to be exploited. This is why the proposal of this article is an ontology, formatted in OWL, describing the object infrastructures, their links with the organization of the multi-agent system and the services to be delivered according to the users of the system. The ontology is applied to smart mobility for people with reduced mobility, and could be adapted to other smart city axes.

Our food preferences guide our food choices and in turn affect our personal health and our social life. In this paper, we adopt an approach using a domain ontology expressed in OWL2 to support the acquisition and representation of preferences in formalism CP-Net. Specifically, we present the construction of the domain ontology and questionnaire design to acquire and represent the preferences. The acquisition and representation of preferences are implemented in the field of university canteen. Our main contribution in this preliminary work is to acquire preferences and enrich the model preferably with domain knowledge represented in the ontology.

This work is done as part of a research master's thesis project. The goal is to generate SPARQL queries based on user-supplied keywords to query RDF graphs. To do this, we first transformed the input ontology into an RDF graph that reflects the semantics represented in the ontology. Subsequently, we stored this RDF graph in the Neo4j graphical database to ensure efficient and persistent management of RDF data. At the time of the interrogation, we studied the different possible and desired interpretations of the request originally made by the user. We have also proposed to carry out a sort of transformation between the two query languages SPARQL and Cypher, which is specific to Neo4j. This allows us to implement the architecture of our system over a wide variety of BD-RDFs providing their query languages, without changing any of the other components of the system. Finally, we tested and evaluated our tool using different test bases, and it turned out that our tool is comprehensive, effective, and powerful enough.

Clinical decision support systems combine knowledge and data from a variety of sources, represented by quantitative models based on stochastic methods, or qualitative based rather on expert heuristics and deductive reasoning. At the same time, case-based reasoning (CBR) memorizes and returns the experience of solving similar problems. The cooperation of heterogeneous clinical knowledge bases (knowledge objects, semantic distances, evaluation functions, logical rules, databases...) is based on medical ontologies. A multi-agent decision support system (MADSS) enables the integration and cooperation of agents specialized in different fields of knowledge (semiology, pharmacology, clinical cases, etc.). Each specialist agent operates a knowledge base defining the conduct to be maintained in conformity with the state of the art associated with an ontological basis that expresses the semantic relationships between the terms of the domain in question. Our approach is based on the specialization of agents adapted to the knowledge models used during the clinical steps and ontologies. This modular approach is suitable for the realization of MADSS in many areas.

The conceptual modelling built from text is rarely an ontology. As a matter of fact, such a conceptualization is corpus-dependent and does not offer the main properties we expect from ontology. Furthermore, ontology extracted from text in general does not match ontology defined by expert using a formal language. It is not surprising since ontology is an extra-linguistic conceptualization whereas knowledge extracted from text is the concern of textual linguistics. Incompleteness of text and using rhetorical figures, like ellipsis, modify the perception of the conceptualization we may have. Ontological knowledge, which is necessary for text understanding, is not in general embedded into documents.