What can we learn from the brain about building better computers? Oliver Rhodes discusses how neuromorphic computing draws on the brain's architecture to develop new approaches to more efficient information processing. Can you give me an overview of your background and the research that you're involved with? Neuromorphic computing is quite a broad subject, which essentially looks to biology as inspiration to develop next-generation computing systems. We work off this principle: we know the brain is this really amazing computer, and it's able to do things that a lot of modern computing systems aren't able to do, and it also does them in an incredibly energy efficient way. We'd like to try to replicate that with some of the systems we build. In the context of the current climate around AI, while we've seen that it's made really big steps forward and is able to do really impressive things, there are certain things that it still can't do that the brain is able to do. So we look to the brain for inspiration to try and solve some of those next generation challenges. Neuromorphic computing covers all aspects of this: from looking at algorithms that might be solving a particular problem, to the systems and subsystems that would be running those algorithms, right down to a chip or devices level. We often use neural networks, which are also employed in artificial intelligence models, such as in deep learning and transformer models.

Neuroscience can't tell us the way to govern people's brains From the age of legal adulthood to the concept of profound autism, policy-makers are turning to neuroscience to help shape laws and policies, but the science simply isn't ready Decisions are often made via a subconscious muddling through, due to the brain's desire to minimise energy use . It is perhaps why we value neat categorisations of someone's brain state, despite these being flawed. Take the age at which you become an adult. Around the world, legal adulthood varies from 16 to 21. This difference matters, as we rightly have different expectations for children versus adults.

Understanding the behavior of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents-- particularly as task and agent sophistication increase--requires more than simple comparison of reward curves, yet standard methods for behavioral analysis remain underdeveloped in DRL. We apply tools from neuroscience and ethology to study DRL agents in a novel, complex, partially observable environment, ForageWorld, designed to capture key aspects of real-world animal foraging--including sparse, depleting resource patches, predator threats, and spatially extended arenas. We use this environment as a platform for applying joint behavioral and neural analysis to agents, revealing detailed, quantitatively grounded insights into agent strategies, memory, and planning. Contrary to common assumptions, we find that modelfree RNN-based DRL agents can exhibit structured, planning-like behavior purely through emergent dynamics--without requiring explicit memory modules or world models. Our results show that studying DRL agents like animals--analyzing them with neuroethology-inspired tools that reveal structure in both behavior and neural dynamics--uncovers rich structure in their learning dynamics that would otherwise remain invisible. We distill these tools into a general analysis framework linking core behavioral and representational features to diagnostic methods, which can be reused for a wide range of tasks and agents. As agents grow more complex and autonomous, bridging neuroscience, cognitive science, and AI will be essential--not just for understanding their behavior, but for ensuring safe alignment and maximizing desirable behaviors that are hard to measure via reward. We show how this can be done by drawing on lessons from how biological intelligence is studied.

Understanding how animals learn is a central challenge in neuroscience, with growing relevance to the development of animal-or human-aligned artificial intelligence. However, existing approaches tend to assume fixed parametric forms for the learning rule (e.g., Q-learning, policy gradient), which may not accurately describe the complex forms of learning employed by animals in realistic settings. Here we address this gap by developing a framework to infer learning rules directly from behavioral data collected during de novo task learning. We assume that animals follow a decision policy parameterized by a generalized linear model (GLM), and we model their learning rule--the mapping from task covariates to per-trial weight updates--using a deep neural network (DNN). This formulation allows flexible, data-driven inference of learning rules while maintaining an interpretable form of the decision policy itself.

A central question in sensory neuroscience is how much, but also what information neurons transmit about the world. While Shannon's information theory provides a principled framework to quantify the amount of information neurons encode about all stimuli, it does not reveal which stimuli contribute most, or what stimulus features are encoded. As a concrete example, it is known that neurons in the early visual cortex are'sensitive' to stimuli in a small region of space (their receptive field). However, it is not clear how such simple intuitions carry to more complex scenarios, e.g. with large, noisy & non-linear population of neurons and high-dimensional stimuli. Several previous measures of neural sensitivity have been proposed.

A fundamental challenge in cognitive neuroscience is understanding how cognition emerges from the interplay between structural connectivity (SC) and dynamic functional connectivity (FC) in the brain. Network neuroscience has emerged as a powerful framework to understand brain function through a holistic perspective on structure-function relationships. In this context, current machine learning approaches typically seek to establish direct mappings between structural connectivity (SC) and functional connectivity (FC) associated with specific cognitive states. However, these state-independent methods often yield inconsistent results due to overlapping brain networks across cognitive states. To address this limitation, we conceptualize to uncover the dendritic coupling mechanism between one static SC and multiple FCs by solving a flow problem that bridges the distribution of SC to a mixed distribution of FCs, conditioned on various cognitive states, along a Riemannian manifold of symmetric positive-definite (SPD) manifold. We further prove the equivalence between flow matching on the SPD manifold and on the computationally efficient Cholesky manifold. Since a spare of functional connections is shared across cognitive states, we introduce the notion of consensus control to promote the shared kinetic structures between multiple FC-to-SC pathways via synchronized coordination, yielding a biologically meaningful underpinning on SC-FC coupling mechanism. Together, we present BrainFlow, a reversible generative model that achieves state-of-the-art performance on not only synthetic data but also large-scale neuroimaging datasets from UK Biobank and Human Connectome Project.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Within a single sniff, the mammalian olfactory system can decode the identity and concentration of odorants wafted on turbulent plumes of air. Yet, it must do so given access only to the noisy, dimensionally-reduced representation of the odor world provided by olfactory receptor neurons. As a result, the olfactory system must solve a compressed sensing problem, relying on the fact that only a handful of the millions of possible odorants are present in a given scene. Inspired by this principle, past works have proposed normative compressed sensing models for olfactory decoding. However, these models have not captured the unique anatomy and physiology of the olfactory bulb, nor have they shown that sensing can be achieved within the 100-millisecond timescale of a single sniff. Here, we propose a rate-based Poisson compressed sensing circuit model for the olfactory bulb.

Overall, our work offers a novel perspective on the cerebellum as a brainneuronal observations while making several testable predictions across multiple mental observations. Moreover, our model also explains recent behavioural and learning while reducing ataxia-like behaviours, consistent with classical experishown to be cerebellar-dependent. In all tasks, we observe that ccRNNs facilitates and cognitive tasks (pattern recognition and caption generation) that have been network (ccRNN) model on a number of sensorimotor (line and digit drawing) tions from a cerebellar module. We test this cortico-cerebellar recurrent neural in which a recurrent cortical network receives online temporal feedback predicdemonstrate the potential of this framework we introduce a systems-level model lum, helps the cerebral cortex solve similar locking problems akin to DNIs.