Goto

Collaborating Authors

 namedindividual


Ontology engineering with Large Language Models

Mateiu, Patricia, Groza, Adrian

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We tackle the task of enriching ontologies by automatically translating natural language sentences into Description Logic. Since Large Language Models (LLMs) are the best tools for translations, we fine-tuned a GPT-3 model to convert Natural Language sentences into OWL Functional Syntax. We employ objective and concise examples to fine-tune the model regarding: instances, class subsumption, domain and range of relations, object properties relationships, disjoint classes, complements, cardinality restrictions. The resulted axioms are used to enrich an ontology, in a human supervised manner. The developed tool is publicly provided as a Protge plugin.


Towards a Modular Ontology for Space Weather Research

Shimizu, Cogan, McGranaghan, Ryan, Eberhart, Aaron, Kellerman, Adam C.

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The interactions between the Sun, interplanetary space, near Earth space environment, the Earth's surface, and the power grid are, perhaps unsurprisingly, very complicated. The study of such requires the collaboration between many different organizations spanning the public and private sectors. Thus, an important component of studying space weather is the integration and analysis of heterogeneous information. As such, we have developed a modular ontology to drive the core of the data integration and serve the needs of a highly interdisciplinary community. This paper presents our preliminary modular ontology, for space weather research, as well as demonstrate a method for adaptation to a particular use-case, through the use of existential rules and explicit typing.


Modeling in OWL 2 without Restrictions

Schneider, Michael, Rudolph, Sebastian, Sutcliffe, Geoff

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The Semantic Web ontology language OWL 2 DL comes with a variety of language features that enable sophisticated and practically useful modeling. However, the use of these features has been severely restricted in order to retain decidability of the language. For example, OWL 2 DL does not allow a property to be both transitive and asymmetric, which would be desirable, e.g., for representing an ancestor relation. In this paper, we argue that the so-called global restrictions of OWL 2 DL preclude many useful forms of modeling, by providing a catalog of basic modeling patterns that would be available in OWL 2 DL if the global restrictions were discarded. We then report on the results of evaluating several state-of-the-art OWL 2 DL reasoners on problems that use combinations of features in a way that the global restrictions are violated. The systems turn out to rely heavily on the global restrictions and are thus largely incapable of coping with the modeling patterns. Next we show how off-the-shelf first-order logic theorem proving technology can be used to perform reasoning in the OWL 2 direct semantics, the semantics that underlies OWL 2 DL, but without requiring the global restrictions. Applying a naive proof-of-concept implementation of this approach to the test problems was successful in all cases. Based on our observations, we make suggestions for future lines of research on expressive description logic-style OWL reasoning.


Generating Mathematical Word Problems

Williams, Sandra (The Open University)

AAAI Conferences

This paper describes a prototype system that generates mathematical word problems from ontologies in unrestricted domains. It builds on an existing ontology verbaliser that renders logical statements written in Web Ontology Language (OWL) as English sentences. This kind of question is more complex than those normally attempted by question generation systems, since mathematical word problems consist of a number of sentences that communicate a short narrative (in addition to providing the relevant numerical information required to solve the underlying mathematical problem). Thus, they embody many research issues that do not crop up with single-sentence questions. As well as describing the prototype system, I discuss five ways in which the difficulty of the generated questions may be controlled automatically during generation.