multiset
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Pasadena (0.04)
- Europe > Denmark (0.04)
Going beyond persistent homology using persistent homology Johanna Immonen University of Helsinki
Augmenting these graph models with topological features via persistent homology (PH) has gained prominence, but identifying the class of attributed graphs that PH can recognize remains open. We introduce a novel concept of color-separating sets to provide a complete resolution to this important problem.
- Europe > Finland > Uusimaa > Helsinki (0.40)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- North America > United States > Arizona > Maricopa County > Phoenix (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
- Workflow (0.68)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.46)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergences
Borja Balle, Gilles Barthe, Marco Gaboardi
Differential privacy comes equipped with multiple analytical tools for the design of private data analyses. One important tool is the so-called "privacy amplification by subsampling" principle, which ensures that a differentially private mechanism run on a random subsample of a population provides higher privacy guarantees than when run on the entire population. Several instances of this principle have been studied for different random subsampling methods, each with an ad-hoc analysis. In this paper we present a general method that recovers and improves prior analyses, yields lower bounds and derives new instances of privacy amplification by subsampling. Our method leverages a characterization of differential privacy as a divergence which emerged in the program verification community. Furthermore, it introduces new tools, including advanced joint convexity and privacy profiles, which might be of independent interest.
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.14)
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Asia > South Korea > Gyeongsangnam-do > Changwon (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Orange County > Irvine (0.04)