LLMs have demonstrated commendable performance across diverse domains. Nevertheless, formulating high-quality prompts to assist them in their work poses a challenge for non-AI experts. Existing research in prompt engineering suggests somewhat scattered optimization principles and designs empirically dependent prompt optimizers. Unfortunately, these endeavors lack a structural design, incurring high learning costs and it is not conducive to the iterative updating of prompts, especially for non-AI experts. Inspired by structured reusable programming languages, we propose LangGPT, a structural prompt design framework. Furthermore, we introduce Minstrel, a multi-generative agent system with reflection to automate the generation of structural prompts. Experiments and the case study illustrate that structural prompts generated by Minstrel or written manually significantly enhance the performance of LLMs. Furthermore, we analyze the ease of use of structural prompts through a user survey in our online community.

Scott Turner's 1993 Minstrel system was a high water mark in story generation, harnessing the concept of imaginative recall to generate creative stories. Using case-based reasoning and an author level planning system, Minstrel models human creative processes. However, the algorithmic and representational commitments made in Minstrel were never subject to principled and quantitative analysis. By rationally reconstructing Minstrel, we are able to investigate Turner's computational model of creativity and learn new lessons about his architecture. We find that Minstrel's original performance was tied to a well-groomed case library, but by modifying several components of the algorithm we can create a more general version which can construct stories using a sparser and less structured case library. Through a rational reconstruction of Minstrel, we both learn new architectural and algorithmic lessons about Minstrel’s computational model of creativity as well as make his architecture available to the contemporary research community for further experimentation.

The first major story generation system, which preceded Minstrel and which While ongoing progress in digital entertainment also received significant attention, is Tale-Spin (Meehan technology continues, commercial designers still largely 1977). Like Minstrel, this system generates stories which eschew systems for procedural story generation, preferring satisfy user-submitted requirements. Tale-Spin creates instead to generate content by hand. In the academic English stories by planning a method for the main literature, projects such as (Appling & Riedl 2009, Roberts character to achieve her or his goal, using inferences and & Isbell 2009) continue to investigate ways to improve the rules to generate a large number of details about a story nuances of interactive storytelling while others attempt to (many of which do little contribute to an audience create their own systems to investigate ways to use experience). This contrasts nicely with Minstrel, which knowledge from interactive narrative and story generation performs no logical inferences and which performs all in new fields such as playable games (Drachen & Hitchens actions from the point of view of an author, manipulating et al. 2009, Sullivan, Mateas & Wardrip-Fruin 2009).

This paper deals with computational approaches to storytelling, or the production of stories by computers, with a particular attention on the way human creativity is modelled or emulated, also in computational terms. Features relevant to creativity and to stories are analysed, and existing systems are reviewed under the light of that analysis.The extent to which they implement the key features proposed in recent models of computational creativity is discussed. Limitations, avenues of future research and expected trends are outlined.