We propose a new principle for transfer learning, based on a straightforward intuition: if two domains are similar to each other, the model trained on one domain should also perform well on the other domain, and vice versa. To formalize this intuition, we define the performance gap as a measure of the discrepancy between the source and target domains. We derive generalization bounds for the instance weighting approach to transfer learning, showing that the performance gap can be viewed as an algorithm-dependent regularizer, which controls the model complexity. Our theoretical analysis provides new insight into transfer learning and motivates a set of general, principled rules for designing new instance weighting schemes for transfer learning. These rules lead to gapBoost, a novel and principled boosting approach for transfer learning. Our experimental evaluation on benchmark data sets shows that gapBoost significantly outperforms previous boosting-based transfer learning algorithms.

To deal with changing environments, a new performance measure--adaptive regret, defined as the maximum static regret over any interval, was proposed in online learning. Under the setting of online convex optimization, several algorithms have been successfully developed to minimize the adaptive regret. However, existing algorithms lack universality in the sense that they can only handle one type of convex functions and need apriori knowledge of parameters. By contrast, there exist universal algorithms, such as MetaGrad, that attain optimal static regret for multiple types of convex functions simultaneously. Along this line of research, this paper presents the first universal algorithm for minimizing the adaptive regret of convex functions. Specifically, we borrow the idea of maintaining multiple learning rates in MetaGrad to handle the uncertainty of functions, and utilize the technique of sleeping experts to capture changing environments.

In forming learning objectives, one oftentimes needs to aggregate a set of individual values to a single output. Such cases occur in the aggregate loss, which combines individual losses of a learning model over each training sample, and in the individual loss for multi-label learning, which combines prediction scores over all class labels. In this work, we introduce the sum of ranked range (SoRR) as a general approach to form learning objectives. A ranked range is a consecutive sequence of sorted values of a set of real numbers. The minimization of SoRR is solved with the difference of convex algorithm (DCA). We explore two applications in machine learning of the minimization of the SoRR framework, namely the AoRR aggregate loss for binary classification and the TKML individual loss for multi-label/multi-class classification. Our empirical results highlight the effectiveness of the proposed optimization framework and demonstrate the applicability of proposed losses using synthetic and real datasets.

We investigate a stochastic counterpart of majority votes over finite ensembles of classifiers, and study its generalization properties. While our approach holds for arbitrary distributions, we instantiate it with Dirichlet distributions: this allows for a closed-form and differentiable expression for the expected risk, which then turns the generalization bound into a tractable training objective.The resulting stochastic majority vote learning algorithm achieves state-of-the-art accuracy and benefits from (non-vacuous) tight generalization bounds, in a series of numerical experiments when compared to competing algorithms which also minimize PAC-Bayes objectives -- both with uninformed (data-independent) and informed (data-dependent) priors.

In this paper we consider the problem of minimizing a submodular function from training data. Submodular functions can be efficiently minimized and are consequently heavily applied in machine learning. There are many cases, however, in which we do not know the function we aim to optimize, but rather have access to training data that is used to learn the function. In this paper we consider the question of whether submodular functions can be minimized in such cases. We show that even learnable submodular functions cannot be minimized within any non-trivial approximation when given access to polynomially-many samples. Specifically, we show that there is a class of submodular functions with range in [0, 1] such that, despite being PAC-learnable and minimizable in polynomial-time, no algorithm can obtain an approximation strictly better than 1/2 o(1) using polynomially-many samples drawn from any distribution. Furthermore, we show that this bound is tight using a trivial algorithm that obtains an approximation of 1/2.

To deal with changing environments, a new performance measure -- adaptive regret, defined as the maximum static regret over any interval, was proposed in online learning. Under the setting of online convex optimization, several algorithms have been successfully developed to minimize the adaptive regret. However, existing algorithms lack universality in the sense that they can only handle one type of convex functions and need apriori knowledge of parameters, which hinders their application in real-world scenarios. To address this limitation, this paper investigates universal algorithms with dual adaptivity, which automatically adapt to the property of functions (convex, exponentially concave, or strongly convex), as well as the nature of environments (stationary or changing). Specifically, we propose a meta-expert framework for dual adaptive algorithms, where multiple experts are created dynamically and aggregated by a meta-algorithm. The meta-algorithm is required to yield a second-order bound, which can accommodate unknown function types. We further incorporate the technique of sleeping experts to capture the changing environments. For the construction of experts, we introduce two strategies (increasing the number of experts or enhancing the capabilities of experts) to achieve universality. Theoretical analysis shows that our algorithms are able to minimize the adaptive regret for multiple types of convex functions simultaneously, and also allow the type of functions to switch between rounds. Moreover, we extend our meta-expert framework to online composite optimization, and develop a universal algorithm for minimizing the adaptive regret of composite functions.

After rebuttal I thank the authors for their reply, they have managed to clarify some of my concerns and overall I vote for acceptance of the paper. This paper introduces a boosting method for transfer learning with instance re-weighting in the setting where labeled data are available in both training and target tasks. Theorem 1 provides a bound for the population error on the target task, and motivates four instance re-weighting principles''. A practical procedure is introduced, which achieves competitive results on two standard datasets for transfer learning. Novelty: To my knowledge, the theoretical analysis carried out by the authors in the context of fully labeled data is novel.

The paper presents a novel theoretical analysis in the context of fully labeled data that is novel and sound. The methodological and algorithmic contributions based on a boosting strategy for a reweighed scheme is novel and shows good results. The experimental study can be improved with more baselines and datasets.