In the hospitality industry, understanding the factors that drive customer review ratings is critical for improving guest satisfaction and business performance. This work proposes ReviewGraph for Review Rating Prediction (RRP), a novel framework that transforms textual customer reviews into knowledge graphs by extracting (subject, predicate, object) triples and associating sentiment scores. Using graph embeddings (Node2Vec) and sentiment features, the framework predicts review rating scores through machine learning classifiers. We compare ReviewGraph performance with traditional NLP baselines (such as Bag of Words, TF-IDF, and Word2Vec) and large language models (LLMs), evaluating them in the HotelRec dataset. In comparison to the state of the art literature, our proposed model performs similar to their best performing model but with lower computational cost (without ensemble). While ReviewGraph achieves comparable predictive performance to LLMs and outperforms baselines on agreement-based metrics such as Cohen's Kappa, it offers additional advantages in interpretability, visual exploration, and potential integration into Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. This work highlights the potential of graph-based representations for enhancing review analytics and lays the groundwork for future research integrating advanced graph neural networks and fine-tuned LLM-based extraction methods. We will share ReviewGraph output and platform open-sourced on our GitHub page https://github.com/aaronlifenghan/ReviewGraph

A.1 Algorithms used in the literature A.1.1 The T

In this article, we introduce a method for learning a capacity underlying a Sugeno integral according to training data based on systems of fuzzy relational equations. To the training data, we associate two systems of equations: a $\max-\min$ system and a $\min-\max$ system. By solving these two systems (in the case that they are consistent) using Sanchez's results, we show that we can directly obtain the extremal capacities representing the training data. By reducing the $\max-\min$ (resp. $\min-\max$) system of equations to subsets of criteria of cardinality less than or equal to $q$ (resp. of cardinality greater than or equal to $n-q$), where $n$ is the number of criteria, we give a sufficient condition for deducing, from its potential greatest solution (resp. its potential lowest solution), a $q$-maxitive (resp. $q$-minitive) capacity. Finally, if these two reduced systems of equations are inconsistent, we show how to obtain the greatest approximate $q$-maxitive capacity and the lowest approximate $q$-minitive capacity, using recent results to handle the inconsistency of systems of fuzzy relational equations.

This paper investigates three different parameterizations of asymmetric uniform quantization for quantization-aware training: (1) scale and offset, (2) minimum and maximum, and (3) beta and gamma. We perform a comprehensive comparative analysis of these parameterizations' influence on quantization-aware training, using both controlled experiments and real-world large language models. Our particular focus is on their changing behavior in response to critical training hyperparameters, bit width and learning rate. Based on our investigation, we propose best practices to stabilize and accelerate quantization-aware training with learnable asymmetric quantization ranges. In settings with limited low-resources, such as on-device applications or in developing countries, model efficiency is critical.

This paper studies Stochastic Shortest Path (SSP) problems in known and unknown environments from the perspective of convex optimisation. It first recalls results in the known parameter case, and develops understanding through different proofs. It then focuses on the unknown parameter case, where it studies extended value iteration (EVI) operators. This includes the existing operators used in Rosenberg et al. [26] and Tarbouriech et al. [31] based on the l-1 norm and supremum norm, as well as defining EVI operators corresponding to other norms and divergences, such as the KL-divergence. This paper shows in general how the EVI operators relate to convex programs, and the form of their dual, where strong duality is exhibited. This paper then focuses on whether the bounds from finite horizon research of Neu and Pike-Burke [21] can be applied to these extended value iteration operators in the SSP setting. It shows that similar bounds to [21] for these operators exist, however they lead to operators that are not in general monotone and have more complex convergence properties. In a special case we observe oscillating behaviour. This paper generates open questions on how research may progress, with several examples that require further examination.

Our chosen model is based on PB with cardinal preferences, i.e., voters have numbers associated with projects Participatory budgeting (PB) is a democratic process that reflect their preferences. Cardinal preferences capture, where citizens jointly decide on how to allocate e.g., settings with approval ballots (only 0 and 1 public funds to indivisible projects. This paper are used), settings where voters can distribute points to focuses on PB processes where citizens may projects (where usually the sum of points is bounded), give additional money to projects they want to see and settings where these numbers accurately correspond funded. We introduce a formal framework for this to the utility of voters. Further, we allow for diversity kind of PB with donations. Our framework also constraints [Bredereck et al., 2018; Benabbou et al., 2019; allows for diversity constraints, meaning that each Yang et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020a]: Each project belongs project belongs to one or more types, and there are to one or more types (based on classifications such as "youth lower and upper bounds on the number of projects and education" or "transport and mobility") and for each type of the same type that can be funded. We propose there is a minimum and maximum number of projects to be three general classes of methods for aggregating the funded. This can also model city-wide referenda where districts citizens' preferences in the presence of donations have their own "project quota".

When presented with Out-of-Distribution (OOD) examples, deep neural networks yield confident, incorrect predictions. Detecting OOD examples is challenging, and the potential risks are high. In this paper, we propose to detect OOD examples by identifying inconsistencies between activity patterns and class predicted. We find that characterizing activity patterns by Gram matrices and identifying anomalies in gram matrix values can yield high OOD detection rates. We identify anomalies in the gram matrices by simply comparing each value with its respective range observed over the training data. Unlike many approaches, this can be used with any pre-trained softmax classifier and does not require access to OOD data for fine-tuning hyperparameters, nor does it require OOD access for inferring parameters. The method is applicable across a variety of architectures and vision datasets and, for the important and surprisingly hard task of detecting far-from-distribution out-of-distribution examples, it generally performs better than or equal to state-of-the-art OOD detection methods (including those that do assume access to OOD examples).

I sat down with the Latent Space team to talk about best practices around collaboration and managing model iteration. In machine learning, bugs may affect the distribution of possible models more than any particular instance, making traditional deterministic tests misleading. Because of this, a test-driven development framework for large ML models must account for the statistical nature of training. This is especially crucial when multiple researchers and engineers are contributing to the same model, as it's easy to silently introduce regressions into a codebase. Here, the team shares some insights about how this new form of test-driven development has been the key to moving quickly on a large-scale collaborative project.

We apply empirical likelihood techniques to contextual bandit policy value estimation, confidence intervals, and learning. We propose a tighter estimator for off-policy evaluation with improved statistical performance over previous proposals. Coupled with this estimator is a confidence interval which also improves over previous proposals. We then harness these to improve learning from contextual bandit data. Each of these is empirically evaluated to show good performance against strong baselines in finite sample regimes.