Partial Maximum Satisfiability (PMS) and Weighted Partial Maximum Satisfiability (WPMS) generalize Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT), with broad real-world applications. Recent advances in Stochastic Local Search (SLS) algorithms for solving (W)PMS have mainly focused on designing clause weighting schemes. However, existing methods often fail to adequately distinguish between PMS and WPMS, typically employing uniform update strategies for clause weights and overlooking critical structural differences between the two problem types. In this work, we present a novel clause weighting scheme that, for the first time, updates the clause weights of PMS and WPMS instances according to distinct conditions. This scheme also introduces a new initialization method, which better accommodates the unique characteristics of both instance types. Furthermore, we propose a decimation method that prioritizes satisfying unit and hard clauses, effectively complementing our proposed clause weighting scheme. Building on these methods, we develop a new SLS solver for (W)PMS named DeepDist. Experimental results on benchmarks from the anytime tracks of recent MaxSAT Evaluations show that DeepDist outperforms state-of-the-art SLS solvers. Notably, a hybrid solver combining DeepDist with TT-Open-WBO-Inc surpasses the performance of the MaxSAT Evaluation 2024 winners, SPB-MaxSAT-c-Band and SPB-MaxSAT-c-FPS, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach. The code is available at https://github.com/jmhmaxsat/DeepDist

Given ancestral constraints, some pruning of the search tree is possible. Lemma 3 (supplementary material) is the key result here. I believe it to be true, but I don't understand the proof. The phrase "By the EC tree edge generation rules, G_k also contains edge Z - W" needs more explanation. In addition there are implied constraints ( "implied constraints" is the standard terminology, here they are called "projected constraints").

Recently, a novel, MaxSAT-based method for error correction in quantum computing has been proposed that requires both incremental MaxSAT solving capabilities and support for XOR constraints, but no dedicated MaxSAT solver fulfilling these criteria existed yet. We alleviate that and introduce IGMaxHS, which is based on the existing solvers iMaxHS and GaussMaxHS, but poses fewer restrictions on the XOR constraints than GaussMaxHS. IGMaxHS is fuzz tested with xwcnfuzz, an extension of wcnfuzz that can directly output XOR constraints. As a result, IGMaxHS is the only solver that reported neither incorrect unsatisfiability verdicts nor invalid models nor incoherent cost model combinations in a final fuzz testing comparison of all three solvers with 10000 instances. We detail the steps required for implementing Gaussian elimination on XOR constraints in CDCL SAT solvers, and extend the recently proposed re-entrant incremental MaxSAT solver application program interface to allow for incremental addition of XOR constraints. Finally, we show that IGMaxHS is capable of decoding quantum color codes through simulation with the Munich Quantum Toolkit.

Though numerous solvers have been proposed for the MaxSAT problem, and the benchmark environment such as MaxSAT Evaluations provides a platform for the comparison of the state-of-the-art solvers, existing assessments were usually evaluated based on the quality, e.g., fitness, of the best-found solutions obtained within a given running time budget. However, concerning solely the final obtained solutions regarding specific time budgets may restrict us from comprehending the behavior of the solvers along the convergence process. This paper demonstrates that Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions can be used to compare MaxSAT local search solvers' anytime performance across multiple problem instances and various time budgets. The assessment reveals distinctions in solvers' performance and displays that the (dis)advantages of solvers adjust along different running times. This work also exhibits that the quantitative and high variance assessment of anytime performance can guide machines, i.e., automatic configurators, to search for better parameter settings. Our experimental results show that the hyperparameter optimization tool, i.e., SMAC, generally achieves better parameter settings of local search when using the anytime performance as the cost function, compared to using the fitness of the best-found solutions.

Existing methods provide varying algorithms for different types of Boolean satisfiability problems (SAT), lacking a general solution framework. Accordingly, this study proposes a unified framework DCSAT based on integer programming and reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm to solve different types of SAT problems such as MaxSAT, Weighted MaxSAT, PMS, WPMS. Specifically, we first construct a consolidated integer programming representation for four types of SAT problems by adjusting objective function coefficients. Secondly, we construct an appropriate reinforcement learning models based on the 0-1 integer programming for SAT problems. Based on the binary tree search structure, we apply the Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) method on SAT problems. Finally, we prove that this method can find all optimal Boolean assignments based on Wiener-khinchin law of large Numbers. We experimentally verify that this paradigm can prune the unnecessary search space to find the optimal Boolean assignments for the problem. Furthermore, the proposed method can provide diverse labels for supervised learning methods for SAT problems.

We propose an incomplete algorithm for Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) specifically designed to run on neural network accelerators such as GPUs and TPUs. Given a MaxSAT problem instance in conjunctive normal form, our procedure constructs a Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) with an equilibrium distribution wherein the probability of a Boolean assignment is exponential in the number of clauses it satisfies. Block Gibbs sampling is used to stochastically search the space of assignments with parallel Markov chains. Since matrix multiplication is the main computational primitive for block Gibbs sampling in an RBM, our approach leads to an elegantly simple algorithm (40 lines of JAX) well-suited for neural network accelerators. Theoretical results about RBMs guarantee that the required number of visible and hidden units of the RBM scale only linearly with the number of variables and constant-sized clauses in the MaxSAT instance, ensuring that the computational cost of a Gibbs step scales reasonably with the instance size. Search throughput can be increased by batching parallel chains within a single accelerator as well as by distributing them across multiple accelerators. As a further enhancement, a heuristic based on unit propagation running on CPU is periodically applied to the sampled assignments. Our approach, which we term RbmSAT, is a new design point in the algorithm-hardware co-design space for MaxSAT. We present timed results on a subset of problem instances from the annual MaxSAT Evaluation's Incomplete Unweighted Track for the years 2018 to 2021. When allotted the same running time and CPU compute budget (but no TPUs), RbmSAT outperforms other participating solvers on problems drawn from three out of the four years' competitions. Given the same running time on a TPU cluster for which RbmSAT is uniquely designed, it outperforms all solvers on problems drawn from all four years.

It has been shown that Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) problem instances can be effectively solved by partitioning the set of soft clauses into several disjoint sets. The partitioning methods can be based on clause weights (e.g., stratification) or based on graph representations of the formula. Afterwards, a merge procedure is applied to guarantee that an optimal solution is found. This paper proposes a new framework called UpMax that decouples the partitioning procedure from the MaxSAT solving algorithms. As a result, new partitioning procedures can be defined independently of the MaxSAT algorithm to be used. Moreover, this decoupling also allows users that build new MaxSAT formulas to propose partition schemes based on knowledge of the problem to be solved. We illustrate this approach using several problems and show that partitioning has a large impact on the performance of unsatisfiability-based MaxSAT algorithms.

Today's powerful, robust SAT solvers have become primary tools for solving hard computational problems.

Boolean MaxSAT, as well as generalized formulations such as Min-MaxSAT and Max-hybrid-SAT, are fundamental optimization problems in Boolean reasoning. Existing methods for MaxSAT have been successful in solving benchmarks in CNF format. They lack, however, the ability to handle 1) (non-CNF) hybrid constraints, such as XORs and 2) generalized MaxSAT problems natively. To address this issue, we propose a novel dynamic-programming approach for solving generalized MaxSAT problems with hybrid constraints -- called \emph{Dynamic-Programming-MaxSAT} or DPMS for short -- based on Algebraic Decision Diagrams (ADDs). With the power of ADDs and the (graded) project-join-tree builder, our versatile framework admits many generalizations of CNF-MaxSAT, such as MaxSAT, Min-MaxSAT, and MinSAT with hybrid constraints. Moreover, DPMS scales provably well on instances with low width. Empirical results indicate that DPMS is able to solve certain problems quickly, where other algorithms based on various techniques all fail. Hence, DPMS is a promising framework and opens a new line of research that invites more investigation in the future.

Recent work proposed the UCTMAXSAT algorithm to address Maximum Satisfiability Problems (MaxSAT) and shown improved performance over pure Stochastic Local Search algorithms (SLS). UCTMAXSAT is based on Monte Carlo Tree Search but it uses SLS instead of purely random playouts. In this work, we introduce two algorithmic variations over UCTMAXSAT. We carry an empirical analysis on MaxSAT benchmarks from recent competitions and establish that both ideas lead to performance improvements. First, a nesting of the tree search inspired by the Nested Monte Carlo Search algorithm is effective on most instance types in the benchmark. Second, we observe that using a static flip limit in SLS, the ideal budget depends heavily on the instance size and we propose to set it dynamically. We show that it is a robust way to achieve comparable performance on a variety of instances without requiring additional tuning.