Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advances in various code-related tasks, particularly in generating source code from natural language descriptions (Zhao et al. (2023); Chang et al. (2024)). Their effectiveness is primarily driven by their extensive number of model parameters, the use of large and diverse datasets, and the immense computational resources employed during training (Kaplan et al. (2020)). These models are typically trained on vast corpora sourced from the web. LLMs are capable of capturing intricate patterns, linguistic subtleties, and semantic relationships. A wide range of models are available for code generation. There are general-purpose models like ChatGPT (Ouyang et al. (2022)), GPT -4 (Achiam et al. (2023)), and LLaMA (Touvron et al. (2023a)) which are designed for a broad range of applications, as well as specialized models such as StarCoder, Code LLaMA (Roziere et al. (2023)), DeepSeek-Coder, and Code Gemma that are optimized for code-related tasks. The integration of code generation with the latest advances in LLM technology is now an essential tool for many businesses, as well as an essential target for LLM developers as programming languages are considered to be different dialects of natural language (Athiwaratkun et al. (2022)).

AI is demanding an evergrowing portion of environmental resources. Despite their potential impact on AI environmental sustainability, the role that programming languages play in AI (in)efficiency is to date still unknown. With this study, we aim to understand the impact that programming languages can have on AI environmental sustainability. To achieve our goal, we conduct a controlled empirical experiment by considering five programming languages (C++, Java, Python, MATLAB, and R), seven AI algorithms (KNN, SVC, AdaBoost, decision tree, logistic regression, naive bayses, and random forest), three popular datasets, and the training and inference phases. The collected results show that programming languages have a considerable impact on AI environmental sustainability. Compiled and semi-compiled languages (C++, Java) consistently consume less than interpreted languages (Python, MATLAB, R), which require up to 54x more energy. Some languages are cumulatively more efficient in training, while others in inference. Which programming language consumes the most highly depends on the algorithm considered. Ultimately, algorithm implementation might be the most determining factor in Green AI, regardless of the language used. As conclusion, while making AI more environmentally sustainable is paramount, a trade-off between energy efficiency and implementation ease should always be considered. Green AI can be achieved without the need of completely disrupting the development practices and technologies currently in place.

ICLabel is an important plug-in function in EEGLAB, the most widely used software for EEG data processing. A powerful approach to automated processing of EEG data involves decomposing the data by Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and then classifying the resulting independent components (ICs) using ICLabel. While EEGLAB pipelines support high-performance computing (HPC) platforms running the open-source Octave interpreter, the ICLabel plug-in is incompatible with Octave because of its specialized neural network architecture. To enhance cross-platform compatibility, we developed a Python version of ICLabel that uses standard EEGLAB data structures. We compared ICLabel MATLAB and Python implementations to data from 14 subjects. ICLabel returns the likelihood of classification in 7 classes of components for each ICA component. The returned IC classifications were virtually identical between Python and MATLAB, with differences in classification percentage below 0.001%.

This paper has proposed an easily replicable and novel approach for developing a Digital Twin (DT) system for industrial robots in intelligent manufacturing applications. Our framework enables effective communication via Robot Web Service (RWS), while a real-time simulation is implemented in Unity 3D and Web-based Platform without any other 3rd party tools. The framework can do real-time visualization and control of the entire work process, as well as implement real-time path planning based on algorithms executed in MATLAB. Results verify the high communication efficiency with a refresh rate of only $17 ms$. Furthermore, our developed web-based platform and Graphical User Interface (GUI) enable easy accessibility and user-friendliness in real-time control.

This study evaluates the capabilities of ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4 in generating code across a diverse range of programming languages. Our objective is to assess the effectiveness of these AI models for generating scientific programs. To this end, we asked ChatGPT to generate three distinct codes: a simple numerical integration, a conjugate gradient solver, and a parallel 1D stencil-based heat equation solver. The focus of our analysis was on the compilation, runtime performance, and accuracy of the codes. While both versions of ChatGPT successfully created codes that compiled and ran (with some help), some languages were easier for the AI to use than others (possibly because of the size of the training sets used). Parallel codes -- even the simple example we chose to study here -- also difficult for the AI to generate correctly.

This research delves into the enhancement of control mechanisms for the da Vinci Surgical System, focusing on the implementation of gravity compensation and refining the modeling of the master and patient side manipulators. Leveraging the Robot Operating System (ROS) the study aimed to fortify the precision and stability of the robots movements essential for intricate surgical procedures. Through rigorous parameter identification and the Euler Lagrange approach the team successfully derived the necessary torque equations and established a robust mathematical model. Implementation of the actual robot and simulation in Gazebo highlighted the efficacy of the developed control strategies facilitating accurate positioning and minimizing drift. Additionally, the project extended its contributions by constructing a comprehensive model for the patient side manipulator laying the groundwork for future research endeavors. This work signifies a significant advancement in the pursuit of enhanced precision and user control in robotic assisted surgeries. NOTE - This work has been submitted to the IEEE R-AL for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible.

This paper proposes a framework for training Reinforcement Learning agents using Python in conjunction with Simulink models. Leveraging Python's superior customization options and popular libraries like Stable Baselines3, we aim to bridge the gap between the established Simulink environment and the flexibility of Python for training bleeding edge agents. Our approach is demonstrated on the Quanser Aero 2, a versatile dual-rotor helicopter. We show that policies trained on Simulink models can be seamlessly transferred to the real system, enabling efficient development and deployment of Reinforcement Learning agents for control tasks. Through systematic integration steps, including C-code generation from Simulink, DLL compilation, and Python interface development, we establish a robust framework for training agents on Simulink models. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, surpassing previous efforts and highlighting the potential of combining Simulink with Python for Reinforcement Learning research and applications.

Machine Learning (ML) and linear System Identification (SI) have been historically developed independently. In this paper, we leverage well-established ML tools - especially the automatic differentiation framework - to introduce SIMBa, a family of discrete linear multi-step-ahead state-space SI methods using backpropagation. SIMBa relies on a novel Linear-Matrix-Inequality-based free parametrization of Schur matrices to ensure the stability of the identified model. We show how SIMBa generally outperforms traditional linear state-space SI methods, and sometimes significantly, although at the price of a higher computational burden. This performance gap is particularly remarkable compared to other SI methods with stability guarantees, where the gain is frequently above 25% in our investigations, hinting at SIMBa's ability to simultaneously achieve state-of-the-art fitting performance and enforce stability. Interestingly, these observations hold for a wide variety of input-output systems and on both simulated and real-world data, showcasing the flexibility of the proposed approach. We postulate that this new SI paradigm presents a great extension potential to identify structured nonlinear models from data, and we hence open-source SIMBa on https://github.com/Cemempamoi/simba.

In this study, we delve into the dynamics of Wordle using data analysis and machine learning. Our analysis initially focused on the correlation between the date and the number of submitted results. Due to initial popularity bias, we modeled stable data using an ARIMAX model with coefficient values of 9, 0, 2, and weekdays/weekends as the exogenous variable. We found no significant relationship between word attributes and hard mode results. To predict word difficulty, we employed a Backpropagation Neural Network, overcoming overfitting via feature engineering. We also used K-means clustering, optimized at five clusters, to categorize word difficulty numerically. Our findings indicate that on March 1st, 2023, around 12,884 results will be submitted and the word "eerie" averages 4.8 attempts, falling into the hardest difficulty cluster. We further examined the percentage of loyal players and their propensity to undertake daily challenges. Our models underwent rigorous sensitivity analyses, including ADF, ACF, PACF tests, and cross-validation, confirming their robustness. Overall, our study provides a predictive framework for Wordle gameplay based on date or a given five-letter word. Results have been summarized and submitted to the Puzzle Editor of the New York Times.

Our test sets were too small and too haphazard to support statistically valid conclusions, but they were suggestive of a number of conclusions. We summarize these here, and discuss them at greater length in section 7. Over the kinds of problems tested, GPT-4 with either plug-in is significantly stronger than GPT-4 by itself, or, almost certainly, than any AI that existed a year ago. However it is still far from reliable; it often outputs a wrong answer or fails to output any answer. In terms of overall score, we would judge that these systems performs on the level of a middling undergraduate student. However, their capacities and weaknesses do not align with a human student; the systems solve some problems that even capable students would find challenging, whereas they fail on some problems that even middling high school students would find easy.