macglashan
MacGlashan
Research in learning from demonstration can generally be grouped into either imitation learning or intention learning. In imitation learning, the goal is to imitate the observed behavior of an expert and is typically achieved using supervised learning techniques. In intention learning, the goal is to learn the intention that motivated the expert's behavior and to use a planning algorithm to derive behavior. Imitation learning has the advantage of learning a direct mapping from states to actions, which bears a small computational cost. Intention learning has the advantage of behaving well in novel states, but may bear a large computational cost by relying on planning algorithms in complex tasks. In this work, we introduce receding horizon inverse reinforcement learning, in which the planning horizon induces a continuum between these two learning paradigms. We present empirical results on multiple domains that demonstrate that performing IRL with a small, but non-zero, receding planning horizon greatly decreases the computational cost of planning while maintaining superior generalization performance compared to imitation learning.
MacGlashan
I present skill bootstrapping, a proposed new research direction for agent learning and planning that allows an agent to start with low-level primitive actions, and develop skills that can be used for higher-level planning. Skills are developed over the course of solving many different problems in a domain, using reinforcement learning techniques to complement the benefits and disadvantages of heuristic-search planning. I describe the overall architecture of the proposed approach and discuss how it relates to other work.
Value Alignment or Misalignment -- What Will Keep Systems Accountable?
Arnold, Thomas (Tufts University) | Kasenberg, Daniel (Tufts University) | Scheutz, Matthias (Tufts University)
Machine learning's advances have led to new ideas about the feasibility and importance of machine ethics keeping pace, with increasing emphasis on safety, containment, and alignment. This paper addresses a recent suggestion that inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) could be a means to so-called "value alignment.'' We critically consider how such an approach can engage the social, norm-infused nature of ethical action and outline several features of ethical appraisal that go beyond simple models of behavior, including unavoidably temporal dimensions of norms and counterfactuals. We propose that a hybrid approach for computational architectures still offers the most promising avenue for machines acting in an ethical fashion.