LU-Net is a simple and fast architecture for invertible neural networks (INN) that is based on the factorization of quadratic weight matrices $\mathsf{A=LU}$, where $\mathsf{L}$ is a lower triangular matrix with ones on the diagonal and $\mathsf{U}$ an upper triangular matrix. Instead of learning a fully occupied matrix $\mathsf{A}$, we learn $\mathsf{L}$ and $\mathsf{U}$ separately. If combined with an invertible activation function, such layers can easily be inverted whenever the diagonal entries of $\mathsf{U}$ are different from zero. Also, the computation of the determinant of the Jacobian matrix of such layers is cheap. Consequently, the LU architecture allows for cheap computation of the likelihood via the change of variables formula and can be trained according to the maximum likelihood principle. In our numerical experiments, we test the LU-net architecture as generative model on several academic datasets. We also provide a detailed comparison with conventional invertible neural networks in terms of performance, training as well as run time.

Segmentation of cardiac structures is one of the fundamental steps to estimate volumetric indices of the heart. This step is still performed semi-automatically in clinical routine, and is thus prone to inter- and intra-observer variability. Recent studies have shown that deep learning has the potential to perform fully automatic segmentation. However, the current best solutions still suffer from a lack of robustness. In this work, we introduce an end-to-end multi-task network designed to improve the overall accuracy of cardiac segmentation while enhancing the estimation of clinical indices and reducing the number of outliers. Results obtained on a large open access dataset show that our method outperforms the current best performing deep learning solution and achieved an overall segmentation accuracy lower than the intra-observer variability for the epicardial border (i.e. on average a mean absolute error of 1.5mm and a Hausdorff distance of 5.1mm) with 11% of outliers. Moreover, we demonstrate that our method can closely reproduce the expert analysis for the end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes, with a mean correlation of 0.96 and a mean absolute error of 7.6ml. Concerning the ejection fraction of the left ventricle, results are more contrasted with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.83 and an absolute mean error of 5.0%, producing scores that are slightly below the intra-observer margin. Based on this observation, areas for improvement are suggested.