Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (LVLMs) have driven the paradigm shift towards general-purpose foundation models. However, both of them are prone to hallucinations, which compromise their factual accuracy and reliability. While existing research primarily focuses on isolated textual-or visual-centric errors, a critical yet underexplored phenomenon persists in LVLMs: Even neither of textual-or visual centric errors occur, LVLMs often struggle with a new and subtle hallucination mode that arising from composition of them. In this paper, we define this issue as Simple Compositional Hallucination (SCHall). Through an preliminary analysis, we present two key findings: (1) visual abstraction fails under compositional questioning, and (2) visual inputs induce degradation in language processing, leading to hallucinations. To facilitate future research on this phenomenon, we introduce a custom benchmark, SCBench, and propose a novel VLR-distillation method, which serves as the first baseline to effectively mitigate SCHall. Furthermore, experiment results on publicly available benchmarks, including both hallucination-specific and general-purpose ones, demonstrate the effectiveness of our VLR-distillation method.

Existing LVLM benchmarks primarily focus onsingle-choice questions orshort-form responses, which donotadequately assess the capabilities ofLVLMs inreal-world human-AI interaction applications.

In this work, we revisit the image classification task using visually-grounded language models (VLMs) such as GPT -4V and LLaV A. We find that

--Recent advances in agentic and physical Artificial Intelligence (AI) have largely focused on ground-based platforms--such as humanoid and wheeled robots--leaving aerial robots relatively underexplored. At the same time, state-of-the-art UA V multimodal vision-language systems typically depend on closed-source models accessible only to well-resourced organizations. T o democratize natural language control of autonomous drones, an open-source agentic framework is presented that integrates PX4-based flight control, Robot Operating System 2 (ROS2) middleware, and locally hosted models using Ollama. Performance is evaluated both in simulation and on a custom quadcopter platform, benchmarking four Large Language Model (LLM) families for command generation and three Vision Language Model (VLM) families for scene understanding. Results indicate that the LLMs, specifically Gemma3, Qwen2.5, and Llama-3.2, consistently produced 100% valid flight commands, while DeepSeek-LLM demonstrated significantly lower performance at 38%. Additionally, all VLMs assessed, including Gemma3, Llama3.2-Vision, and Llava1.6, are able to detect the presence of specified objects and give valid binary responses ranging from 97% to 100%.

Vision-language models (VLMs) show promise for autonomous driving but often lack transparent reasoning capabilities that are critical for safety. We investigate whether explicitly modeling reasoning during fine-tuning enhances VLM performance on driving decision tasks. Using GPT-4o, we generate structured reasoning chains for driving scenarios from the DriveLM benchmark with category-specific prompting strategies. We compare reasoning-based fine-tuning, answer-only fine-tuning, and baseline instruction-tuned models across multiple small VLM families (Llama 3.2, Llava 1.5, and Qwen 2.5VL). Our results demonstrate that reasoning-based fine-tuning consistently outperforms alternatives, with Llama3.2-11B-reason achieving the highest performance. Models fine-tuned with reasoning show substantial improvements in accuracy and text generation quality, suggesting explicit reasoning enhances internal representations for driving decisions. These findings highlight the importance of transparent decision processes in safety-critical domains and offer a promising direction for developing more interpretable autonomous driving systems.

The rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (LLMs) has opened new frontiers in artificial intelligence, enabling the integration of diverse large-scale data types such as text, images, and spatial information. In this paper, we explore the potential of multimodal LLMs (MLLM) for geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI), a field that leverages spatial data to address challenges in domains including Geospatial Semantics, Health Geography, Urban Geography, Urban Perception, and Remote Sensing. We propose a MLLM (OmniGeo) tailored to geospatial applications, capable of processing and analyzing heterogeneous data sources, including satellite imagery, geospatial metadata, and textual descriptions. By combining the strengths of natural language understanding and spatial reasoning, our model enhances the ability of instruction following and the accuracy of GeoAI systems. Results demonstrate that our model outperforms task-specific models and existing LLMs on diverse geospatial tasks, effectively addressing the multimodality nature while achieving competitive results on the zero-shot geospatial tasks. Our code will be released after publication.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements, capitalizing on the impressive capabilities of large language models (LLMs) across diverse tasks. Despite this, a critical challenge known as hallucination occurs when models overconfidently describe objects or attributes absent from the image, a problem exacerbated by the tendency of VLMs to rely on linguistic priors. This limitation reduces model reliability in high-stakes applications. In this work, we have observed the characteristic of logits' continuity consistency enhancement and introduced a straightforward and efficient method, Cross-Temporal Prediction Connection (TPC), designed to enhance the semantic consistency of logits by connecting them temporally across timesteps. TPC amplifies information flow and improves coherence, effectively reducing hallucination. Extensive experiments show that TPC surpasses existing representatives, delivering superior performance in both accuracy and efficiency while maintaining robustness in open-ended text generation tasks.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) excel at multimodal perception and understanding, yet their tendency to generate hallucinated or inaccurate responses undermines their trustworthiness. Existing methods have largely overlooked the importance of refusal responses as a means of enhancing MLLMs reliability. To bridge this gap, we present the Information Boundary-aware Learning Framework (InBoL), a novel approach that empowers MLLMs to refuse to answer user queries when encountering insufficient information. To the best of our knowledge, InBoL is the first framework that systematically defines the conditions under which refusal is appropriate for MLLMs using the concept of information boundaries proposed in our paper. This framework introduces a comprehensive data generation pipeline and tailored training strategies to improve the model's ability to deliver appropriate refusal responses. To evaluate the trustworthiness of MLLMs, we further propose a user-centric alignment goal along with corresponding metrics. Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in refusal accuracy without noticeably compromising the model's helpfulness, establishing InBoL as a pivotal advancement in building more trustworthy MLLMs.