lcmodel
Strategies to Minimize Out-of-Distribution Effects in Data-Driven MRS Quantification
Merkofer, Julian P., Kaiser, Antonia, Schrantee, Anouk, Gurney-Champion, Oliver J., van Sloun, Ruud J. G.
This study systematically compared data-driven and model-based strategies for metabolite quantification in magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), focusing on resilience to out-of-distribution (OoD) effects and the balance between accuracy, robustness, and generalizability. A neural network designed for MRS quantification was trained using three distinct strategies: supervised regression, self-supervised learning, and test-time adaptation. These were compared against model-based fitting tools. Experiments combined large-scale simulated data, designed to probe metabolite concentration extrapolation and signal variability, with 1H single-voxel 7T in-vivo human brain spectra. In simulations, supervised learning achieved high accuracy for spectra similar to those in the training distribution, but showed marked degradation when extrapolated beyond the training distribution. Test-time adaptation proved more resilient to OoD effects, while self-supervised learning achieved intermediate performance. In-vivo experiments showed larger variance across the methods (data-driven and model-based) due to domain shift. Across all strategies, overlapping metabolites and baseline variability remained persistent challenges. While strong performance can be achieved by data-driven methods for MRS metabolite quantification, their reliability is contingent on careful consideration of the training distribution and potential OoD effects. When such conditions in the target distribution cannot be anticipated, test-time adaptation strategies ensure consistency between the quantification, the data, and the model, enabling reliable data-driven MRS pipelines.
- Europe > Netherlands > North Brabant > Eindhoven (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland > Vaud > Lausanne (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.48)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.46)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.92)
- Health & Medicine > Health Care Technology (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Inductive Learning (0.88)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.68)
An artificially intelligent magnetic resonance spectroscopy quantification method: Comparison between QNet and LCModel on the cloud computing platform CloudBrain-MRS
Lin, Meijin, Guo, Lin, Chen, Dicheng, Chen, Jianshu, Tu, Zhangren, Huang, Xu, Wang, Jianhua, Qi, Ji, Long, Yuan, Huang, Zhiguo, Guo, Di, Qu, Xiaobo, Han, Haiwei
Objctives: This work aimed to statistically compare the metabolite quantification of human brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) between the deep learning method QNet and the classical method LCModel through an easy-to-use intelligent cloud computing platform CloudBrain-MRS. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, two 3 T MRI scanners Philips Ingenia and Achieva collected 61 and 46 in vivo 1H magnetic resonance (MR) spectra of healthy participants, respectively, from the brain region of pregenual anterior cingulate cortex from September to October 2021. The analyses of Bland-Altman, Pearson correlation and reasonability were performed to assess the degree of agreement, linear correlation and reasonability between the two quantification methods. Results: Fifteen healthy volunteers (12 females and 3 males, age range: 21-35 years, mean age/standard deviation = 27.4/3.9 years) were recruited. The analyses of Bland-Altman, Pearson correlation and reasonability showed high to good consistency and very strong to moderate correlation between the two methods for quantification of total N-acetylaspartate (tNAA), total choline (tCho), and inositol (Ins) (relative half interval of limits of agreement = 3.04%, 9.3%, and 18.5%, respectively; Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.775, 0.927, and 0.469, respectively). In addition, quantification results of QNet are more likely to be closer to the previous reported average values than those of LCModel. Conclusion: There were high or good degrees of consistency between the quantification results of QNet and LCModel for tNAA, tCho, and Ins, and QNet generally has more reasonable quantification than LCModel.
latrend: A Framework for Clustering Longitudinal Data
Teuling, Niek Den, Pauws, Steffen, Heuvel, Edwin van den
Clustering of longitudinal data is used to explore common trends among subjects over time for a numeric measurement of interest. Various R packages have been introduced throughout the years for identifying clusters of longitudinal patterns, summarizing the variability in trajectories between subject in terms of one or more trends. We introduce the R package "latrend" as a framework for the unified application of methods for longitudinal clustering, enabling comparisons between methods with minimal coding. The package also serves as an interface to commonly used packages for clustering longitudinal data, including "dtwclust", "flexmix", "kml", "lcmm", "mclust", "mixAK", and "mixtools". This enables researchers to easily compare different approaches, implementations, and method specifications. Furthermore, researchers can build upon the standard tools provided by the framework to quickly implement new cluster methods, enabling rapid prototyping. We demonstrate the functionality and application of the latrend package on a synthetic dataset based on the therapy adherence patterns of patients with sleep apnea.
- Europe > Netherlands > North Brabant > Eindhoven (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Sleep (0.34)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology (0.34)
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quantification Aided by Deep Estimations of Imperfection Factors and Macromolecular Signal
Chen, Dicheng, Lin, Meijin, Liu, Huiting, Li, Jiayu, Zhou, Yirong, Kang, Taishan, Lin, Liangjie, Wu, Zhigang, Wang, Jiazheng, Li, Jing, Lin, Jianzhong, Chen, Xi, Guo, Di, Qu, Xiaobo
Objective: Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) is an important technique for biomedical detection. However, it is challenging to accurately quantify metabolites with proton MRS due to serious overlaps of metabolite signals, imperfections because of non-ideal acquisition conditions, and interference with strong background signals mainly from macromolecules. The most popular method, LCModel, adopts complicated non-linear least square to quantify metabolites and addresses these problems by designing empirical priors such as basis-sets, imperfection factors. However, when the signal-to-noise ratio of MRS signal is low, the solution may have large deviation. Methods: Linear Least Squares (LLS) is integrated with deep learning to reduce the complexity of solving this overall quantification. First, a neural network is designed to explicitly predict the imperfection factors and the overall signal from macromolecules. Then, metabolite quantification is solved analytically with the introduced LLS. In our Quantification Network (QNet), LLS takes part in the backpropagation of network training, which allows the feedback of the quantification error into metabolite spectrum estimation. This scheme greatly improves the generalization to metabolite concentrations unseen for training compared to the end-to-end deep learning method. Results: Experiments show that compared with LCModel, the proposed QNet, has smaller quantification errors for simulated data, and presents more stable quantification for 20 healthy in vivo data at a wide range of signal-to-noise ratio. QNet also outperforms other end-to-end deep learning methods. Conclusion: This study provides an intelligent, reliable and robust MRS quantification. Significance: QNet is the first LLS quantification aided by deep learning.
- Asia > China > Fujian Province > Xiamen (0.05)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Belmont (0.04)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area (0.93)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.46)