Goto

Collaborating Authors

 lacour


LaCour!: Enabling Research on Argumentation in Hearings of the European Court of Human Rights

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

What can we learn about law and legal argumentation from court judgments alone? Contemporary research addresses empirical legal questions (e.g., which arguments are used) or legal NLP questions (e.g., predicting case outcomes) by relying on the availability of the final'products' of each case, the court decisions (Habernal et al, 2023; Medvedeva et al, 2020). The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is a prominent data source, as its decisions are freely available in a large amount, along with the metadata of the violated articles and other attributes. This makes ECHR a popular choice among NLP researchers (Aletras et al, 2016; Chalkidis et al, 2020). However, whether or not the legal arguments in ECHR's cases are created as a part of legal deliberation or are created post-hoc after reaching a decision remains an open (and partly controversial) question. In order to better understand the legal argument mechanics, that is which arguments of the parties were presented, discussed, or questioned, and thus might have influenced the case outcome, we must take the oral hearings into account. We witness that the availability of oral hearing transcripts of the U.S. Supreme Court enables further legal research (Ashley et al, 2007). However, empirical research into the interplay of arguments at the court hearings and the final judgments has been so far impossible for the ECHR, as there are no hearing transcripts available.


Robot injected in the skull spreads its tentacles to monitor the brain

New Scientist

The robot's soft legs are filled with sensors that measure brain activity A soft robot inserted through a tiny hole in the skull can deploy six sensor-filled legs on the surface of the brain. A version of this soft robot has been successfully tested in a miniature pig and could be scaled up for human testing in the future. The concept offers a less invasive approach for placing electrodes on the brain's surface compared with the traditional method, in which surgeons cut a hole in the skull the size of the fully extended device. If it proves safe and effective in humans, it could eventually help monitor and even treat people who experience epileptic seizures or other neurological disorders. "There's actually a really large surface area that you can reach without doing a large craniotomy," says Stéphanie Lacour at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne.