Fairness and robustness are critical elements of Trustworthy AI that need to be addressedtogether.

Trustworthy AI is becoming essential for modern machine learning.

Current instruction-tuned language models are exclusively trained with textual preference data and thus are often not aligned with the unique requirements of other modalities, such as speech. To better align language models with the speech domain, we explore (i) prompting strategies grounded in radio-industry best practices and (ii) preference learning using a novel speech-based preference data of 20K samples, generated with a wide spectrum of prompts that induce varying dimensions of speech-suitability and labeled by annotators who listen to response pairs. Both human and automatic evaluation show that both prompting and preference learning increase the speech-suitability of popular instruction-tuned LLMs. Interestingly, we find that prompting and preference learning can be additive; combining them achieves the best win rates in head-to-head comparison, resulting in responses that are preferred or tied to the base model in 76.2% of comparisons on average. Lastly, we share lexical, syntactical, and qualitative analyses to showcase how each method contributes to improving the speech-suitability of generated responses.

Learning with noisy labels is an important topic for scalable training in many real-world scenarios. However, few previous research considers this problem in the online setting, where the arrival of data is streaming. In this paper, we propose a novel gradient-based approach to enable the detection of noisy labels for the online learning of model parameters, named Online Gradient-based Robust Selection (OGRS). In contrast to the previous sample selection approach for the offline training that requires the estimation of a clean ratio of the dataset before each epoch of training, OGRS can automatically select clean samples by steps of gradient update from datasets with varying clean ratios without changing the parameter setting. During the training process, the OGRS method selects clean samples at each iteration and feeds the selected sample to incrementally update the model parameters. We provide a detailed theoretical analysis to demonstrate data selection process is converging to the low-loss region of the sample space, by introducing and proving the sub-linear local Lagrangian regret of the non-convex constrained optimization problem. Experimental results show that it outperforms state-of-the-art methods in different settings.

In this paper, we study a simple and generic framework to tackle the problem of learning model parameters when a fraction of the training samples are corrupted. We first make a simple observation: in a variety of such settings, the evolution of training accuracy (as a function of training epochs) is different for clean and bad samples. Based on this we propose to iteratively minimize the trimmed loss, by alternating between (a) selecting samples with lowest current loss, and (b) retraining a model on only these samples. We prove that this process recovers the ground truth (with linear convergence rate) in generalized linear models with standard statistical assumptions. Experimentally, we demonstrate its effectiveness in three settings: (a) deep image classifiers with errors only in labels, (b) generative adversarial networks with bad training images, and (c) deep image classifiers with adversarial (image, label) pairs (i.e., backdoor attacks). For the well-studied setting of random label noise, our algorithm achieves state-of-the-art performance without having access to any a-priori guaranteed clean samples.