intervention target
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Tōhoku > Iwate Prefecture > Morioka (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.14)
- Africa > Ethiopia > Addis Ababa > Addis Ababa (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.67)
- Research Report > Strength High (0.46)
- North America > United States (0.92)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.92)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.92)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.28)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Tōhoku > Iwate Prefecture > Morioka (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Tübingen Region > Tübingen (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.92)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- North America > United States > Hawaii > Honolulu County > Honolulu (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Tübingen Region > Tübingen (0.04)
- (11 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (0.67)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- North America > United States > Hawaii > Honolulu County > Honolulu (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Tübingen Region > Tübingen (0.04)
- (11 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (0.67)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.27)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Tōhoku > Iwate Prefecture > Morioka (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Tübingen Region > Tübingen (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.46)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Stanford (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- North America > Puerto Rico > San Juan > San Juan (0.04)
- (4 more...)
DeepITE: Designing Variational Graph Autoencoders for Intervention Target Estimation
Intervention Target Estimation (ITE) is vital for both understanding and decision-making in complex systems, yet it remains underexplored. Current ITE methods are hampered by their inability to learn from distinct intervention instances collaboratively and to incorporate rich insights from labeled data, which leads to inefficiencies such as the need for re-estimation of intervention targets with minor data changes or alterations in causal graphs. In this paper, we propose DeepITE, an innovative deep learning framework designed around a variational graph autoencoder. DeepITE can concurrently learn from both unlabeled and labeled data with different intervention targets and causal graphs, harnessing correlated information in a self or semi-supervised manner. The model's inference capabilities allow for the immediate identification of intervention targets on unseen samples and novel causal graphs, circumventing the need for retraining. Our extensive testing confirms that DeepITE not only surpasses 13 baseline methods in the Recall@k metric but also demonstrates expeditious inference times, particularly on large graphs. Moreover, incorporating a modest fraction of labeled data (5-10\%) substantially enhances DeepITE's performance, further solidifying its practical applicability. Our source code is available at https://github.com/alipay/DeepITE.