inreceptacle
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Planning & Scheduling (0.97)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.49)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Planning & Scheduling (0.97)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.49)
Dynamic Planning with a LLM
Dagan, Gautier, Keller, Frank, Lascarides, Alex
While Large Language Models (LLMs) can solve many NLP tasks in zero-shot settings, applications involving embodied agents remain problematic. In particular, complex plans that require multi-step reasoning become difficult and too costly as the context window grows. Planning requires understanding the likely effects of one's actions and identifying whether the current environment satisfies the goal state. While symbolic planners find optimal solutions quickly, they require a complete and accurate representation of the planning problem, severely limiting their use in practical scenarios. In contrast, modern LLMs cope with noisy observations and high levels of uncertainty when reasoning about a task. Our work presents LLM Dynamic Planner (LLM-DP): a neuro-symbolic framework where an LLM works hand-in-hand with a traditional planner to solve an embodied task. Given action-descriptions, LLM-DP solves Alfworld faster and more efficiently than a naive LLM ReAct baseline.
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.04)
- Europe > Ireland > Leinster > County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)