Goto

Collaborating Authors

 inparticular





ed519dacc89b2bead3f453b0b05a4a8b-Supplemental.pdf

Neural Information Processing Systems

Figure 11: Comparison of HCAM (labeled as HTM) with different chunk sizes to TrXL across the different ballet levels. The performance of the HCAM model is robust to varying chunk size, indicating that HCAM does not need a task-relevant segmentation to perform well.






Appendix

Neural Information Processing Systems

This is only for the ease of visualization. For linear MDP,In the generative model setting, Agarwal et al. [2020] shows model-based approach is still minimax optimal O((1 γ) 3SA/2)byusing as-absorbing MDP construction andthismodelbased technique is later reused for other more general settings (e.g. Itrequires high probability guarantee for learning optimal policyforany reward function, which is strictly stronger than the standard learning task that one only needs to learn to optimal policy for a fixed reward. B.2 GeneralabsorbingMDP The general absorbing MDP is defined as follows: for a fixed states and a sequence {ut}Ht=1, MDPMs,{ut}Ht=1 is identical toM for all states excepts, and state s is absorbing in the sense PMs,{ut}Ht=1(s|s,a) = 1 for all a, and the instantaneous reward at timet is rt(s,a) = ut for all a A. Also,weusetheshorthand notationVπ{s,ut} forVπs,Ms,{u We focus on the first claim. Later we shall remove the conditional onN (see SectionB.7). We use the singleton-absorbing MDPMs,{u?t}Ht=1 to handle the case (recallu?t


1d8dc55c1f6cf124af840ce1d92d1896-Paper-Conference.pdf

Neural Information Processing Systems

As inthe classical problem, weights are fixed by an adversary and elements appear in random order. In contrast to previous variants of predictions, our algorithm only has access toamuch weakerpiece ofinformation: anadditive gapc.