inparticular
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.06)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.05)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
Appendix
This is only for the ease of visualization. For linear MDP,In the generative model setting, Agarwal et al. [2020] shows model-based approach is still minimax optimal O((1 γ) 3SA/2)byusing as-absorbing MDP construction andthismodelbased technique is later reused for other more general settings (e.g. Itrequires high probability guarantee for learning optimal policyforany reward function, which is strictly stronger than the standard learning task that one only needs to learn to optimal policy for a fixed reward. B.2 GeneralabsorbingMDP The general absorbing MDP is defined as follows: for a fixed states and a sequence {ut}Ht=1, MDPMs,{ut}Ht=1 is identical toM for all states excepts, and state s is absorbing in the sense PMs,{ut}Ht=1(s|s,a) = 1 for all a, and the instantaneous reward at timet is rt(s,a) = ut for all a A. Also,weusetheshorthand notationVπ{s,ut} forVπs,Ms,{u We focus on the first claim. Later we shall remove the conditional onN (see SectionB.7). We use the singleton-absorbing MDPMs,{u?t}Ht=1 to handle the case (recallu?t
- Europe > Austria > Vienna (0.14)
- Europe > Germany (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- (10 more...)