inlier
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Russia (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.04)
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Hudson County > Hoboken (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.05)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Utah (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Research Report (0.67)
- Overview (0.46)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > La Jolla (0.04)
- (3 more...)
Appendix A On the Assumptions and Efficacy of the White Noise Test
In this section we provide visualizations to better understand the statistical power of our test, and to verify the claims in Section 2.3. We can see that R constructed from outlier images generally include a higher proportion of unexplained semantic information: comparing the CelebA residual in Fig.3(a) (second column) where the model is trained on CIFAR-10, to Fig.3(b) (first column) where CelebA is inlier, we can see that the facial structure in CelebA residual is more evident when the model is trained on CIFAR-10. Similarly, comparing the CIFAR-10 residual from both models, we can see that the structure of the vehicle (e.g. As the residual sequences constructed from outliers tend to have more natural image-like structures, they will also have stronger spatial autocorrelations, compared with residuals from inlier samples that should in principle be white noise. Note that while the residual sequences constructed from inliers also contain unexplained semantic information, this is due to estimation error of the deep AR model, and should not happen should we have access to the ground truth model, as we have shown in Section 2.2.