This paper considers the problem of learning from multiple sets of inaccurate labels, which can be easily obtained from low-cost annotators, such as rule-based annotators. Previous works typically concentrate on aggregating information from all the annotators, overlooking the significance of data refinement. This paper presents a collaborative refining approach for learning from inaccurate labels. To refine the data, we introduce the annotator agreement as an instrument, which refers to whether multiple annotators agree or disagree on the labels for a given sample. For samples where some annotators disagree, a comparative strategy is proposed to filter noise.

For samples where some annotators disagree, a comparative strategy is proposed to filter noise.

This paper considers the problem of learning from multiple sets of inaccurate labels, which can be easily obtained from low-cost annotators, such as rule-based annotators. Previous works typically concentrate on aggregating information from all the annotators, overlooking the significance of data refinement. This paper presents a collaborative refining approach for learning from inaccurate labels. To refine the data, we introduce the annotator agreement as an instrument, which refers to whether multiple annotators agree or disagree on the labels for a given sample. For samples where some annotators disagree, a comparative strategy is proposed to filter noise.

Learning from inaccurate annotations has gained significant attention due to the high cost of precise labeling. However, despite the presence of erroneous labels, models trained on noisy data often retain the ability to make accurate predictions. This intriguing phenomenon raises a fundamental yet largely unexplored question: why models can still extract correct label information from inaccurate annotations remains unexplored. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive investigation into this issue. By analyzing weight matrices from both empirical and theoretical perspectives, we find that label inaccuracy primarily accumulates noise in lower singular components and subtly perturbs the principal subspace. Within a certain range, the principal subspaces of weights trained on inaccurate labels remain largely aligned with those learned from clean labels, preserving essential task-relevant information. We formally prove that the angles of principal subspaces exhibit minimal deviation under moderate label inaccuracy, explaining why models can still generalize effectively. Building on these insights, we propose LIP, a lightweight plug-in designed to help classifiers retain principal subspace information while mitigating noise induced by label inaccuracy. Extensive experiments on tasks with various inaccuracy conditions demonstrate that LIP consistently enhances the performance of existing algorithms. We hope our findings can offer valuable theoretical and practical insights to understand of model robustness under inaccurate supervision.

The realm of AIOps is transforming IT landscapes with the power of AI and ML. Despite the challenge of limited labeled data, supervised models show promise, emphasizing the importance of leveraging labels for training, especially in deep learning contexts. This study enhances the field by introducing a taxonomy for log anomalies and exploring automated data labeling to mitigate labeling challenges. It goes further by investigating the potential of diverse anomaly detection techniques and their alignment with specific anomaly types. However, the exploration doesn't stop at anomaly detection. The study envisions a future where root cause analysis follows anomaly detection, unraveling the underlying triggers of anomalies. This uncharted territory holds immense potential for revolutionizing IT systems management. In essence, this paper enriches our understanding of anomaly detection, and automated labeling, and sets the stage for transformative root cause analysis. Together, these advances promise more resilient IT systems, elevating operational efficiency and user satisfaction in an ever-evolving technological landscape.

Fine-grained entity typing (FET) is an essential task in natural language processing that aims to assign semantic types to entities in text. However, FET poses a major challenge known as the noise labeling problem, whereby current methods rely on estimating noise distribution to identify noisy labels but are confused by diverse noise distribution deviation. To address this limitation, we introduce Co-Prediction Prompt Tuning for noise correction in FET, which leverages multiple prediction results to identify and correct noisy labels. Specifically, we integrate prediction results to recall labeled labels and utilize a differentiated margin to identify inaccurate labels. Moreover, we design an optimization objective concerning divergent co-predictions during fine-tuning, ensuring that the model captures sufficient information and maintains robustness in noise identification. Experimental results on three widely-used FET datasets demonstrate that our noise correction approach significantly enhances the quality of various types of training samples, including those annotated using distant supervision, ChatGPT, and crowdsourcing.