hypergraph
Inhomogeneous Hypergraph Clustering with Applications
Hypergraph partitioning is an important problem in machine learning, computer vision and network analytics. A widely used method for hypergraph partitioning relies on minimizing a normalized sum of the costs of partitioning hyperedges across clusters. Algorithmic solutions based on this approach assume that different partitions of a hyperedge incur the same cost. However, this assumption fails to leverage the fact that different subsets of vertices within the same hyperedge may have different structural importance. We hence propose a new hypergraph clustering technique, termed inhomogeneous hypergraph partitioning, which assigns different costs to different hyperedge cuts. We prove that inhomogeneous partitioning produces a quadratic approximation to the optimal solution if the inhomogeneous costs satisfy submodularity constraints. Moreover, we demonstrate that inhomogenous partitioning offers significant performance improvements in applications such as structure learning of rankings, subspace segmentation and motif clustering.
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
Assembly Fuzzy Representation on Hypergraph for Open-Set 3D Object Retrieval Y ang Xu
The lack of object-level labels presents a significant challenge for 3D object retrieval in the open-set environment. However, part-level shapes of objects often share commonalities across categories but remain underexploited in existing retrieval methods. In this paper, we introduce the Hypergraph-Based Assembly Fuzzy Representation (HAFR) framework, which navigates the intricacies of open-set 3D object retrieval through a bottom-up lens of Part Assembly .
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > Tompkins County > Ithaca (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.46)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia (0.04)
- Europe > Italy (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Workflow (0.67)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Education (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology (0.92)
- Information Technology (0.67)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- North America > United States > Washington > King County > Seattle (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- North America > United States > Illinois (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > Erie County > Buffalo (0.04)
- (2 more...)