One difficulty in using artificial agents for human-assistive applications lies in the challenge of accurately assisting with a person's goal(s). Existing methods tend to rely on inferring the human's goal, which is challenging when there are many potential goals or when the set of candidate goals is difficult to identify. We propose a new paradigm for assistance by instead increasing the human's ability to control their environment, and formalize this approach by augmenting reinforcement learning with human empowerment .

In social robot navigation, traditional metrics like proxemics and behavior naturalness emphasize human comfort and adherence to social norms but often fail to capture an agent's autonomy and adaptability in dynamic environments. This paper introduces human empowerment, an information-theoretic concept that measures a human's ability to influence their future states and observe those changes, as a complementary metric for evaluating social compliance. This metric reveals how robot navigation policies can indirectly impact human empowerment. We present a framework that integrates human empowerment into the evaluation of social performance in navigation tasks. Through numerical simulations, we demonstrate that human empowerment as a metric not only aligns with intuitive social behavior, but also shows statistically significant differences across various robot navigation policies. These results provide a deeper understanding of how different policies affect social compliance, highlighting the potential of human empowerment as a complementary metric for future research in social navigation.

Almost every company understands the value that artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML) can bring to their business, but for many, the potential risks of adding AI do not outweigh the benefits. Report after report consistently ranks AI as critically important to C-suite executives. To remain competitive means streamlining processes, increasing efficiency and improving outcomes, all of which can be achieved through AI and ML decisioning. Despite the value that AI and ML bring, a lack of trust or fear that the technology will open businesses to more risk has slowed the implementation of AI/ML decisioning. This isn't wholly unfounded--the risk of biased decisions in highly regulated industries and applications, like insurance eligibility, mortgage lending or talent acquisition, has been the subject of several new laws focused on the "right to explainability."

One difficulty in using artificial agents for human-assistive applications lies in the challenge of accurately assisting with a person's goal(s). Existing methods tend to rely on inferring the human's goal, which is challenging when there are many potential goals or when the set of candidate goals is difficult to identify. We propose a new paradigm for assistance by instead increasing the human's ability to control their environment, and formalize this approach by augmenting reinforcement learning with human empowerment. This task-agnostic objective preserves the person's autonomy and ability to achieve any eventual state. We test our approach against assistance based on goal inference, highlighting scenarios where our method overcomes failure modes stemming from goal ambiguity or misspecification. As existing methods for estimating empowerment in continuous domains are computationally hard, precluding its use in real time learned assistance, we also propose an efficient empowerment-inspired proxy metric. Using this, we are able to successfully demonstrate our method in a shared autonomy user study for a challenging simulated teleoperation task with human-in-the-loop training.

The next generation of mobile robots needs to be socially-compliant to be accepted by humans. As simple as this task may seem, defining compliance formally is not trivial. Yet, classical reinforcement learning (RL) relies upon hard-coded reward signals. In this work, we go beyond this approach and provide the agent with intrinsic motivation using empowerment. Empowerment maximizes the influence of an agent on its near future and has been shown to be a good model for biological behaviors. It also has been used for artificial agents to learn complicated and generalized actions. Self-empowerment maximizes the influence of an agent on its future. On the contrary, our robot strives for the empowerment of people in its environment, so they are not disturbed by the robot when pursuing their goals. We show that our robot has a positive influence on humans, as it minimizes the travel time and distance of humans while moving efficiently to its own goal. The method can be used in any multi-agent system that requires a robot to solve a particular task involving humans interactions.