Goto

Collaborating Authors

 hopper


Implementing advanced AI technologies in finance

MIT Technology Review

Successful AI implementation requires shifts in workplace culture as well as use cases that can scale across the enterprise. In finance departments that have long been defined by precision and control, AI has arrived less as a neatly managed upgrade than as a quiet insurgency. Employees are already using it while leadership races to impose structure, governance, and strategy after the fact. The result is a paradox: one of the most tightly regulated functions in the enterprise is now among the most experimentally transformed. What's emerging is a layered shift in how work gets done. From variance commentary and fraud detection to contract review and close narrative drafting, AI is embedding itself across workflows, particularly where unstructured data once slowed down everything.



A Hyperparameter Settings of RD

Neural Information Processing Systems

In this section, we describe details about hyperparameter setting of RD. SAC-N-Unc and TD3-N-Unc, M is set to 1/10 of the total training steps. To ensure fairness, algorithms employing RD are implemented using CORL repository [54]. By modifying the original SAC/TD3 algorithm to employ a critic ensemble of number N and incorporate an uncertainty regularization term within the policy update process, we derive these backbone algorithms. Additionally, using RD with fewer Q ensembles can achieve similar or even better results than the backbone methods using more Q ensembles, indicating its potential in reducing computing resource consumption.





SupplementaryMaterialfor BAIL: Best-ActionImitationLearningfor BatchDeepReinforcementLearning

Neural Information Processing Systems

Note that ˆφ is feasible for the constrained optimization problem. We refer to it as an "early stopping scheme" because the key idea is to return to the parameter values which gave the lowest validation error (see Section 7.8 of Goodfellow et al.[3]). In our implementation, we initialize two upper envelope networks with parametersφ and φ0, where φ is trained using the penalty loss, andφ0 records the parameters with the lowest validation error encounteredsofar. IfLφ > Lφ0, we count the number of consecutive times this occurs. Notonlyis this not standard practice, but to makeafair comparison across all algorithms, this would require, foreachofthe fivealgorithms, performing aseparate hyper-parameter search foreachofthe five environments.