hogwild
Cyclades: Conflict-free Asynchronous Machine Learning
We present Cyclades, a general framework for parallelizing stochastic optimization algorithms in a shared memory setting. Cyclades is asynchronous during model updates, and requires no memory locking mechanisms, similar to Hogwild!-type algorithms. Unlike Hogwild!, Cyclades introduces no conflicts during parallel execution, and offers a black-box analysis for provable speedups across a large family of algorithms. Due to its inherent cache locality and conflict-free nature, our multi-core implementation of Cyclades consistently outperforms Hogwild!-type algorithms on sufficiently sparse datasets, leading to up to 40% speedup gains compared to Hogwild!, and up to 5\times gains over asynchronous implementations of variance reduction algorithms.
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.05)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County > Philadelphia (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 11 > Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
Cyclades: Conflict-free Asynchronous Machine Learning
We present Cyclades, a general framework for parallelizing stochastic optimization algorithms in a shared memory setting. Cyclades is asynchronous during model updates, and requires no memory locking mechanisms, similar to Hogwild!-type algorithms. Unlike Hogwild!, Cyclades introduces no conflicts during parallel execution, and offers a black-box analysis for provable speedups across a large family of algorithms. Due to its inherent cache locality and conflict-free nature, our multi-core implementation of Cyclades consistently outperforms Hogwild!-type algorithms on sufficiently sparse datasets, leading to up to 40% speedup gains compared to Hogwild!, and up to 5\times gains over asynchronous implementations of variance reduction algorithms.
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- South America > Paraguay > Asunción > Asunción (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois (0.04)
- (3 more...)
HOGWILD!-Gibbs can be PanAccurate
Asynchronous Gibbs sampling has been recently shown to be fast-mixing and an accurate method for estimating probabilities of events on a small number of variables of a graphical model satisfying Dobrushin's condition~\cite{DeSaOR16}. We investigate whether it can be used to accurately estimate expectations of functions of {\em all the variables} of the model. Under the same condition, we show that the synchronous (sequential) and asynchronous Gibbs samplers can be coupled so that the expected Hamming distance between their (multivariate) samples remains bounded by $O(\tau \log n),$ where $n$ is the number of variables in the graphical model, and $\tau$ is a measure of the asynchronicity. A similar bound holds for any constant power of the Hamming distance. Hence, the expectation of any function that is Lipschitz with respect to a power of the Hamming distance, can be estimated with a bias that grows logarithmically in $n$. Going beyond Lipschitz functions, we consider the bias arising from asynchronicity in estimating the expectation of polynomial functions of all variables in the model.
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Tyne and Wear > Sunderland (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
Hogwild! Inference: Parallel LLM Generation via Concurrent Attention
Rodionov, Gleb, Garipov, Roman, Shutova, Alina, Yakushev, George, Schultheis, Erik, Egiazarian, Vage, Sinitsin, Anton, Kuznedelev, Denis, Alistarh, Dan
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to tackle increasingly complex tasks through advanced reasoning, long-form content generation, and tool use. Solving these tasks often involves long inference-time computations. In human problem solving, a common strategy to expedite work is collaboration: by dividing the problem into sub-tasks, exploring different strategies concurrently, etc. Recent research has shown that LLMs can also operate in parallel by implementing explicit cooperation frameworks, such as voting mechanisms or the explicit creation of independent sub-tasks that can be executed in parallel. However, each of these frameworks may not be suitable for all types of tasks, which can hinder their applicability. In this work, we propose a different design approach: we run LLM "workers" in parallel , allowing them to synchronize via a concurrently-updated attention cache and prompt these workers to decide how best to collaborate. Our approach allows the LLM instances to come up with their own collaboration strategy for the problem at hand, all the while "seeing" each other's memory in the concurrent KV cache. We implement this approach via Hogwild! Inference: a parallel LLM inference engine where multiple instances of the same LLM run in parallel with the same attention cache, with "instant" access to each other's memory. Hogwild! Inference takes advantage of Rotary Position Embeddings (RoPE) to avoid recomputation while improving parallel hardware utilization. We find that modern reasoning-capable LLMs can perform inference with shared Key-Value cache out of the box, without additional fine-tuning.
- Europe > Austria (0.04)
- Asia > Thailand > Bangkok > Bangkok (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- (6 more...)
Export Reviews, Discussions, Author Feedback and Meta-Reviews
"NIPS Neural Information Processing Systems 8-11th December 2014, Montreal, Canada",,, "Paper ID:","24" "Title:","Communication Efficient Distributed Machine Learning with the Parameter Server" Current Reviews First provide a summary of the paper, and then address the following criteria: Quality, clarity, originality and significance. This paper presents improvements on a system for large-scale learning known as parameter server. The parameter server is designed to perform reliable distributed machine learning in large-scale industrial systems (1000's of nodes). The architecture is based on a bipartite graph composed by servers and workers. Workers compute gradients based on subsets of the training instances, while servers aggregate the workers' gradients, update the shared parameter vector and redistribute it to the workers for the next iteration.
We would like to thank all reviewers for their comments and questions
We would like to thank all reviewers for their comments and questions. We appreciate your recommendation about reordering the paper. Y our example is correct. We will rephrase this remark to make it more clear. Nguyen et al. [25] recognize the fact that for a strongly-convex Hence, like Nguyen et al. [25], Theorem 1 (iii) avoids the incompatible bounded-gradients assumption