While much research has focused on hallucinations in multiple modalities including images and natural language text, less attention has been given to hallucinations in source code, which leads to incorrect and vulnerable code that causes significant financial loss. To pave the way for research in LLMs' hallucinations in code, we introduce Collu-Bench, a benchmark for predicting code hallucinations of LLMs across code generation (CG) and automated program repair (APR) tasks. Collu-Bench includes 13,234 code hallucination instances collected from five datasets and 11 diverse LLMs, ranging from open-source models to commercial ones. To better understand and predict code hallucinations, Collu-Bench provides detailed features such as the per-step log probabilities of LLMs' output, token types, and the execution feedback of LLMs' generated code for in-depth analysis. In addition, we conduct experiments to predict hallucination on Collu-Bench, using both traditional machine learning techniques and neural networks, which achieves 22.03 - 33.15% accuracy. Our experiments draw insightful findings of code hallucination patterns, reveal the challenge of accurately localizing LLMs' hallucinations, and highlight the need for more sophisticated techniques. Despite the great potential and impressive success of LLMs (Touvron et al., 2023; Brown et al., 2020; Li et al., 2022a; OpenAI, 2024), a known issue of LLMs is hallucination, a phenomenon where the model generates fluent and plausible-sounding but unfaithful or fabricated content (Ji et al., 2023). The hallucination issue poses a significant risk when deploying LLMs in real-world applications that require precise information (Puchert et al., 2023). Due to this importance, researchers have developed benchmarks such as TruthfulQA (Lin et al., 2022), FELM (chen et al., 2023), and HaluEval (Li et al., 2023b) to understand and predict hallucinations of LLMs. Additionally, researchers are actively exploring methods to mitigate hallucinations (Liu et al., 2024b; Elaraby et al., 2023; Dhuliawala et al., 2023; Yan et al., 2024). Another domain where LLMs have been widely applied is source code.

This paper presents a novel exploration into the regressive side effects of training Large Language Models (LLMs) to mimic student misconceptions for personalized education. We highlight the problem that as LLMs are trained to more accurately mimic student misconceptions, there is a compromise in the factual integrity and reasoning ability of the models. Our work involved training an LLM on a student-tutor dialogue dataset to predict student responses. The results demonstrated a decrease in the model's performance across multiple benchmark datasets, including the ARC reasoning challenge and TruthfulQA, which evaluates the truthfulness of model's generated responses. Furthermore, the HaluEval Dial dataset, used for hallucination detection, and MemoTrap, a memory-based task dataset, also reported a decline in the model accuracy. To combat these side effects, we introduced a "hallucination token" technique. This token, appended at the beginning of each student response during training, instructs the model to switch between mimicking student misconceptions and providing factually accurate responses. Despite the significant improvement across all datasets, the technique does not completely restore the LLM's baseline performance, indicating the need for further research in this area. This paper contributes to the ongoing discussion on the use of LLMs for student modeling, emphasizing the need for a balance between personalized education and factual accuracy.

Simultaneous machine translation (SiMT) is a challenging task that requires starting translation before the full source sentence is available. Prefix-to-prefix framework is often applied to SiMT, which learns to predict target tokens using only a partial source prefix. However, due to the word order difference between languages, misaligned prefix pairs would make SiMT models suffer from serious hallucination problems, i.e. target outputs that are unfaithful to source inputs. Such problems can not only produce target tokens that are not supported by the source prefix, but also hinder generating the correct translation by receiving more source words. In this work, we propose a Confidence-Based Simultaneous Machine Translation (CBSiMT) framework, which uses model confidence to perceive hallucination tokens and mitigates their negative impact with weighted prefix-to-prefix training. Specifically, token-level and sentence-level weights are calculated based on model confidence and acted on the loss function. We explicitly quantify the faithfulness of the generated target tokens using the token-level weight, and employ the sentence-level weight to alleviate the disturbance of sentence pairs with serious word order differences on the model. Experimental results on MuST-C English-to-Chinese and WMT15 German-to-English SiMT tasks demonstrate that our method can consistently improve translation quality at most latency regimes, with up to 2 BLEU scores improvement at low latency.