We study the noise-free Gaussian Process (GP) bandit problem, in which a learner seeks to minimize regret through noise-free observations of a black-box objective function that lies in a known reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound (GP-UCB) algorithm is a well-known approach for GP bandits, where query points are adaptively selected based on the GP-based upper confidence bound score. While several existing works have reported the practical success of GP-UCB, its theoretical performance remains suboptimal. However, GP-UCB often empirically outperforms other nearly-optimal noise-free algorithms that use non-adaptive sampling schemes. This paper resolves the gap between theoretical and empirical performance by establishing a nearly-optimal regret upper bound for noise-free GP-UCB. Specifically, our analysis provides the first constant cumulative regret bounds in the noise-free setting for both the squared exponential kernel and the Mat ern kernel with some degree of smoothness.

This paper addresses the Bayesian optimization problem (also referred to as the Bayesian setting of the Gaussian process bandit), where the learner seeks to minimize the regret under a function drawn from a known Gaussian process (GP). Under a Mat\'ern kernel with some extent of smoothness, we show that the Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) algorithm achieves $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ cumulative regret with high probability. Furthermore, our analysis yields $O(\sqrt{T \ln^2 T})$ regret under a squared exponential kernel. These results fill the gap between the existing regret upper bound of GP-UCB and the current best upper bound provided by Scarlett [2018]. The key idea in our proof is to capture the concentration behavior of the input sequence realized by GP-UCB, enabling us to handle GP's information gain in a refined manner.

We study the noise-free Gaussian Process (GP) bandit problem, in which a learner seeks to minimize regret through noise-free observations of a black-box objective function that lies in a known reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound (GP-UCB) algorithm is a well-known approach for GP bandits, where query points are adaptively selected based on the GP-based upper confidence bound score. While several existing works have reported the practical success of GP-UCB, its theoretical performance remains suboptimal. However, GP-UCB often empirically outperforms other nearly-optimal noise-free algorithms that use non-adaptive sampling schemes. This paper resolves the gap between theoretical and empirical performance by establishing a nearly-optimal regret upper bound for noise-free GP-UCB. Specifically, our analysis provides the first constant cumulative regret bounds in the noise-free setting for both the squared exponential kernel and the Matérn kernel with some degree of smoothness.

In the kernelized bandit problem, a learner aims to sequentially compute the optimum of a function lying in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space given only noisy evaluations at sequentially chosen points. In particular, the learner aims to minimize regret, which is a measure of the suboptimality of the choices made. Arguably the most popular algorithm is the Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound (GP-UCB) algorithm, which involves acting based on a simple linear estimator of the unknown function. Despite its popularity, existing analyses of GP-UCB give a suboptimal regret rate, which fails to be sublinear for many commonly used kernels such as the Mat ern kernel. This has led to a longstanding open question: are existing regret analyses for GP-UCB tight, or can bounds be improved by using more sophisticated analytical techniques? In this work, we resolve this open question and show that GP-UCB enjoys nearly optimal regret. In particular, our results yield sublinear regret rates for the Mat ern kernel, improving over the state-of-the-art analyses and partially resolving a COL T open problem posed by V akili et al. Our improvements rely on a key technical contribution -- regularizing kernel ridge estimators in proportion to the smoothness of the underlying kernel k . Applying this key idea together with a largely overlooked concentration result in separable Hilbert spaces (for which we provide an independent, simplified derivation), we are able to provide a tighter analysis of the GP-UCB algorithm.

We thank the reviewers for their constructive comments. The two terms on the RHS of Eq. (13) are monotone increasing functions, and Using our Lemma 5.1's proof, Lemma 5.8 and Theorem 2's proof in Srinivas et al [19], the regret bound GP-UCB is chosen as it has ability to analyze convergence, which is very important in the unknown search space setting. EI convergence can be shown only in noiseless setting, PI/ES/PES do not have convergence proof yet). Thank you for the compliment though. We have conducted more experiments with the 10-dimensional functions Ackley10 and Levy10.