Randomly initialized neural networks induce a prior over functions, but the predictor used in practice is produced only after training. We ask how much of this initial bias survives the training pipeline. To make the question measurable, we introduce initialization memory: the dependence of the validation-selected predictor on the scale of the random initialization. We perform controlled CIFAR-10 experiments on ResNets where initialization memory already sharply separates training regimes. Low-learning-rate SGD can interpolate while still remembering its initialization: on ResNet-9 with batch size $b=128$, test accuracy varies by $26.5$ percentage points across initialization scales despite $\ge99.5\%$ training accuracy. This is not undertraining: extending the same low-learning-rate regime to $5{,}000$ epochs leaves the spread essentially unchanged. In contrast, Adam-family methods largely erase the dependence. SGD can also be made to forget when larger learning rates are paired with explicit $L_2$ norm control. We interpret these findings in terms of the time scale of forgetting: gradient-flow-like dynamics can preserve initialization memory, whereas stochastic finite-step effects, explicit norm decay, and adaptive preconditioning erase it on scales governed by the size of explicit or implicit regularization. The practical inductive bias of a trained network is therefore not the architectural prior alone, but the architectural prior after being filtered by the forgetting dynamics of the training pipeline; and the same regularizers that improve generalization are precisely those that erase memory of initialization.

Modern statistical learning theory and deep learning characterize generalization primarily in terms of continuous capacity control (e.g., norm-based regularization, margin maximization, low-rank bias). While highly successful in continuous domains, deep learning consistently fails to extrapolate exact algorithmic or discrete algebraic rules, reflecting a missing inductive bias toward algorithmic complexity minimization. We propose the Cayley-table completion as the canonical testbed for this missing bias, serving as the discrete algebraic counterpart to matrix completion. Just as matrix factorization combined with weight decay yields an implicit geometric bias toward low linear rank, recent results demonstrate that operator-valued tensor factorizations paired with a flatness prior yield an implicit algorithmic bias toward exact discrete associativity. We pose the open problem of establishing formal exact recovery bounds for Cayley-table completion, and challenge the community to generalize continuous flatness priors to autonomously discover broader discrete algorithmic axioms without combinatorial search.

We consider $L^2$-regularized linear (ridge) regression over a finite data sample $X$ with bounded covariance and linear prediction targets $y$ with additive isotropic noise of finite variance. We present an iterative procedure to compute the optimal regularization strength numerically from the generative parameters in the fixed-$X$ setting and prove its convergence at limited noise levels. Our experimental evaluation over synthetic data shows that the proposed procedure combined with sample-based parameter estimates attains near-optimal random-$X$ generalization across a wide range of sample sizes, aspect ratios, and noise levels, at an added computational cost equivalent to one preliminary ridge regression in the underparameterized regime and two in the overparameterized case.

Understanding the relationship between generalization and privacy remains a central challenge in modern machine learning theory, particularly for deep networks trained by variants of differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD). In this work we make progress on this persistent open problem by proving a finite-sample bound on the approximate max-information of DP-SGD that exhibits scaling properties comparable with (Dwork et al, 2015)'s classic result for $ε$-differentially private algorithms, namely at most linear in the dataset size. From our result we obtain a general-purpose PAC-Bayes generalization bound in which the necessary prior distribution can be learned by DP-SGD, as well as a generalization bound for DP-SGD-trained models themselves, with a complexity term that is fully explicit and controlled by the optimization hyperparameters.

Deep learning is increasingly viewed as a dynamical process in parameter space, yet many existing theories still treat training as a closed optimization system. This view is limited for real-world AI, where models operate under uncertainty, resource constraints, distribution shift, downstream decision risks, and human feedback. We propose Human-Centered Learning Mechanics (HCLM), a dynamical and information-theoretic framework for open and controlled learning systems. The central idea is that entropy regularization is useful only when the chosen entropy surrogate generates a non-degenerate information force along the optimization trajectory. Otherwise, entropy terms may produce weak, unstable, or misaligned gradients, causing the dynamics to collapse toward ordinary loss minimization. We introduce the notion of effective entropy and study tractable geometric entropy surrogates, including variance-based and log-determinant covariance proxies. The paper makes three contributions. First, it formalizes entropy regularization through effective information force and characterizes degenerate entropy regimes. Second, it derives convergence, entropy-flow, Wasserstein-gradient-flow, and noisy-representation generalization results under explicit assumptions. Third, it offers a conditional dynamical interpretation of scaling-law-like behavior as a balance between information injection, entropy dissipation, and residual risk, without claiming an unconditional derivation of empirical neural scaling laws. Controlled representation-learning experiments support the hypothesis that geometric entropy surrogates, especially log-determinant covariance entropy, induce stronger and more stable information forces than softmax-normalized entropy.

Characterizing precisely the asymptotic generalization error of neural networks using parameters that can be estimated efficiently is a crucial problem in machine learning, which relies heavily on heuristics and practitioners' intuition to make key design choices. In order to mitigate this issue, we introduce the Representation Gap, a metric closely related to the generalization error, but admitting better-behaved asymptotic dynamics. Focusing on equivariant diffusion models and leveraging results from optimal quantization and point-process theory, we derive a precise asymptotic equivalent of the Representation Gap and show that it is governed by a single parameter, the \textit{intrinsic dimension} of the task, which is easy to interpret, efficient to estimate, and can be linked to the equivariances of common neural network architectures. We show that this asymptotic dynamic also extends to a broader range of tasks and training algorithms. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that our asymptotic law and intrinsic dimension estimation are accurate on a wide range of synthetic datasets, where these quantities are known, as well as on more realistic datasets, where we obtain results consistent with the related literature.

One of the most fundamental properties of a machine learning model is its complexity, with applications across topics such as interpretation, generalization, and model selection. Despite its importance, there is no canonical, model-agnostic way to assess a model's complexity. While simple heuristics, such as the number or magnitude of parameters, yield very crude estimates, hyperparameter-based approaches, such as polynomial degree or kernel length scale, do not generalize across model classes. More rigorous methods, including the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension (VCD) (Vapnik, 2013), Rademacher complexity (RMC) (Bartlett and Mendelson, 2002), and effective number of parameters (or effective degrees of freedom, ENP) (Efron, 1986), are difficult, or even impossible, to compute in practice, leaving the user to resort to crude bounds and/or approximations. The topic is further complicated by the often overlooked distinction between model and function complexity, where the former sets a ceiling on the latter.

Highly over-parameterized models can simultaneously memorize noisy labels and generalize well, yet how these behaviors coexist remains poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the underlying mechanisms of this coexistence using modular arithmetic tasks under heavy label noise. Through extensive experiments on two-layer neural networks, we find that larger models tend to generalize better under appropriate optimization and model configurations, while noisy labels are memorized faster than clean data. Over-parameterized models internally form a generalization structure, but its expression in the output is suppressed by the need to fit noisy labels. Remarkably, even with 80\% label noise, near-perfect test accuracy can be achieved by extracting this internal structure using frequency-based methods. We further propose a task-agnostic method to partition networks into generalization and memorization components. Although this subnetwork improves generalization, it is limited compared with frequency-based extraction, indicating that the generalization structure is distributed across neurons and motivating the development of new tools to retrieve generalizable knowledge from over-parameterized networks.

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and their variational counterparts (VPINNs) are neural networks that incorporate physical laws, making them useful for scientific problems. Existing generalization analyses for PINNs and VPINNs remain limited, often requiring restrictive assumptions such as stability conditions or linear ellipticity. In this paper, we derive generalization bounds for neural networks that involve differentiation with respect to input variables, covering PINNs and VPINNs under a unified framework. We apply Taylor expansion to represent nonlinear differential operators as linear operators on a high-dimensional space, enabling the use of Koopman-based analysis and showing that high-rank networks can generalize well even in settings involving differential operators. We also show that the nonlinearity of the differential operator exponentially enlarges the bound, highlighting its significant impact on generalization.

Inverse optimization (IO) seeks to infer the parameters of a decision-maker's objective from observed context--action data. We study noiseless IO, where demonstrations are generated by a ground-truth objective. We provide a high-probability ${O}(\frac{d}{T})$ generalization bound for the induced action set, where $d$ is the number of unknown parameters and $T$ is the size of the training dataset. We strengthen these guarantees under additional conditions that ensure uniqueness of the chosen action, bringing our IO guarantees in line with best-arm identification results in the bandit literature. We further show that the ${O}(\frac{d}{T})$ rate is tight over all consistent estimators considered here, and extend the result to both instantaneous and cumulative regret. Notably, the resulting regret lower bound matches the corresponding upper bounds in the adversarial setting, indicating that the stochastic IO setting is effectively adversarial for the class of estimators studied here. Finally, we propose a parameter-free algorithm with lower per-iteration complexity than generic solvers. Experiments validate the predicted rates and illustrate the tightness of our bounds.