This paper extends three Lasso inferential methods, Debiased Lasso, $C(\alpha)$ and Selective Inference to a survey environment. We establish the asymptotic validity of the inference procedures in generalized linear models with survey weights and/or heteroskedasticity. Moreover, we generalize the methods to inference on nonlinear parameter functions e.g. the average marginal effect in survey logit models. We illustrate the effectiveness of the approach in simulated data and Canadian Internet Use Survey 2020 data.

This paper formulates a general cross validation framework for signal denoising. The general framework is then applied to nonparametric regression methods such as Trend Filtering and Dyadic CART. The resulting cross validated versions are then shown to attain nearly the same rates of convergence as are known for the optimally tuned analogues. There did not exist any previous theoretical analyses of cross validated versions of Trend Filtering or Dyadic CART. To illustrate the generality of the framework we also propose and study cross validated versions of two fundamental estimators; lasso for high dimensional linear regression and singular value thresholding for matrix estimation. Our general framework is inspired by the ideas in Chatterjee and Jafarov (2015) and is potentially applicable to a wide range of estimation methods which use tuning parameters.

In this paper, we introduce structured sparsity estimators in Generalized Linear Models. Structured sparsity estimators in the least squares loss are introduced by Stucky and van de Geer (2018) recently for fixed design and normal errors. We extend their results to debiased structured sparsity estimators with Generalized Linear Model based loss. Structured sparsity estimation means penalized loss functions with a possible sparsity structure used in the chosen norm. These include weighted group lasso, lasso and norms generated from convex cones. The significant difficulty is that it is not clear how to prove two oracle inequalities. The first one is for the initial penalized Generalized Linear Model estimator. Since it is not clear how a particular feasible-weighted nodewise regression may fit in an oracle inequality for penalized Generalized Linear Model, we need a second oracle inequality to get oracle bounds for the approximate inverse for the sample estimate of second-order partial derivative of Generalized Linear Model. Our contributions are fivefold: 1. We generalize the existing oracle inequality results in penalized Generalized Linear Models by proving the underlying conditions rather than assuming them. One of the key issues is the proof of a sample one-point margin condition and its use in an oracle inequality. 2. Our results cover even non sub-Gaussian errors and regressors. 3. We provide a feasible weighted nodewise regression proof which generalizes the results in the literature from a simple l_1 norm usage to norms generated from convex cones. 4. We realize that norms used in feasible nodewise regression proofs should be weaker or equal to the norms in penalized Generalized Linear Model loss. 5. We can debias the first step estimator via getting an approximate inverse of the singular-sample second order partial derivative of Generalized Linear Model loss.

We establish oracle inequalities for the least squares estimator $\hat f$ with penalty on the total variation of $\hat f$ or on its higher order differences. Our main tool is an interpolating vector that leads to upper bounds for the effective sparsity. This allows one to show that the penalty on the $k^{\text{th}}$ order differences leads to an estimator $\hat f$ that can adapt to the number of jumps in the $(k-1)^{\text{th}}$ order differences. We present the details for $k=2, \ 3$ and expose a framework for deriving the result for general $k\in \mathbb{N}$.

Model selection is an important challenge, if one works with data sets containing many predictors. Finding relevant variables helps to understand better the problem and improves statistical inference. In t he literature there are many methods solving such problems. One of them is empiri cal risk minimization with the penalty, for instance Lasso (Tibshir ani, 1996). The main characteristic of this procedure is an ability to selec t relevant predictors and estimate unknown parameters simultaneously. In th e paper we apply these ideas to the pairwise ranking problem (ordinal r egression) that 1 relates to predicting or guessing the ordering between obje cts on the basis of their observed predictors. The problem of ranking has num erous applications in practice, for instance in information retrieval, banking or quality control.

We consider the setting of linear regression in high dimension. We focus on the problem of constructing adaptive and honest confidence sets for the sparse parameter \theta, i.e. we want to construct a confidence set for theta that contains theta with high probability, and that is as small as possible. The l_2 diameter of a such confidence set should depend on the sparsity S of \theta - the larger S, the wider the confidence set. However, in practice, S is unknown. This paper focuses on constructing a confidence set for \theta which contains \theta with high probability, whose diameter is adaptive to the unknown sparsity S, and which is implementable in practice.

This paper consider penalized empirical loss minimization of convex loss functions with unknown non-linear target functions. Using the elastic net penalty we establish a finite sample oracle inequality which bounds the loss of our estimator from above with high probability. If the unknown target is linear this inequality also provides an upper bound of the estimation error of the estimated parameter vector. These are new results and they generalize the econometrics and statistics literature. Next, we use the non-asymptotic results to show that the excess loss of our estimator is asymptotically of the same order as that of the oracle. If the target is linear we give sufficient conditions for consistency of the estimated parameter vector. Next, we briefly discuss how a thresholded version of our estimator can be used to perform consistent variable selection. We give two examples of loss functions covered by our framework and show how penalized nonparametric series estimation is contained as a special case and provide a finite sample upper bound on the mean square error of the elastic net series estimator.