Developing amethod forhigh-quality reconstruction ofseenimages fromthecorresponding brain activity is an important milestone towards decoding the contents of dreams and mental imagery (Fig 1a). In this task, one attempts to solve for the mapping between fMRI recordings and their corresponding natural images, using many "labeled"{Image, fMRI} pairs (i.e., images and their corresponding fMRIresponses).

Reconstructing observed images from fMRI brain recordings is challenging. Unfortunately, acquiring sufficient ''labeled'' pairs of {Image, fMRI} (i.e., images with their corresponding fMRI responses) to span the huge space of natural images is prohibitive for many reasons. We present a novel approach which, in addition to the scarce labeled data (training pairs), allows to train fMRI-to-image reconstruction networks also on unlabeled data (i.e., images without fMRI recording, and fMRI recording without images). The proposed model utilizes both an Encoder network (image-to-fMRI) and a Decoder network (fMRI-to-image). Concatenating these two networks back-to-back (Encoder-Decoder & Decoder-Encoder) allows augmenting the training data with both types of unlabeled data. Importantly, it allows training on the unlabeled test-fMRI data.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

The fMRI data come from Shen et al. which contains Each run's first 8s recordings are discarded. The fMRI recordings are shifted by 4s. The training images come from ImageNet (Deng et al., To compare the semantic decoding qualities from different ROIs'

This'divide and conquer' strategy captures visual information more accurately.

In addition, we will add necessary details to the unclear parts in the article.

The paper explains well how computing RSA using estimates of regression weights can result in a biased similarity matrix. However, in many cases in neuroscience, the RSA is computed directly on the patterns of activity, and not the estimates of regression weights beta. This diminishes the relevance of this paper to the neuroscience field. The authors very briefly address this alternate way of computing RSA in lines 123-128. It is unclear how this alternative RSA computation is biased if it does not depend on a proxy for beta estimates, and needs to be addressed further.

Reconstructing observed images from fMRI brain recordings is challenging. Unfortunately, acquiring sufficient ''labeled'' pairs of {Image, fMRI} (i.e., images with their corresponding fMRI responses) to span the huge space of natural images is prohibitive for many reasons. We present a novel approach which, in addition to the scarce labeled data (training pairs), allows to train fMRI-to-image reconstruction networks also on "unlabeled" data (i.e., images without fMRI recording, and fMRI recording without images). The proposed model utilizes both an Encoder network (image-to-fMRI) and a Decoder network (fMRI-to-image). Concatenating these two networks back-to-back (Encoder-Decoder & Decoder-Encoder) allows augmenting the training data with both types of unlabeled data.