facmac
FACMAC: FactoredMulti-AgentCentralised PolicyGradients
However, FACMAClearnsacentralised butfactored critic,which combines per-agent utilities into the joint action-value function via a non-linear monotonic function, as inQMIX, apopular multi-agentQ-learning algorithm. However,unlikeQMIX, there are no inherent constraints on factoring the critic. We thus also employ a nonmonotonic factorisation and empirically demonstrate that its increased representational capacity allows it to solve some tasks that cannot be solved with monolithic, ormonotonically factored critics.
FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradients
We propose FACtored Multi-Agent Centralised policy gradients (FACMAC), a new method for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning in both discrete and continuous action spaces. Like MADDPG, a popular multi-agent actor-critic method, our approach uses deep deterministic policy gradients to learn policies. However, FACMAC learns a centralised but factored critic, which combines per-agent utilities into the joint action-value function via a non-linear monotonic function, as in QMIX, a popular multi-agent $Q$-learning algorithm. However, unlike QMIX, there are no inherent constraints on factoring the critic. We thus also employ a nonmonotonic factorisation and empirically demonstrate that its increased representational capacity allows it to solve some tasks that cannot be solved with monolithic, or monotonically factored critics. In addition, FACMAC uses a centralised policy gradient estimator that optimises over the entire joint action space, rather than optimising over each agent's action space separately as in MADDPG. This allows for more coordinated policy changes and fully reaps the benefits of a centralised critic. We evaluate FACMAC on variants of the multi-agent particle environments, a novel multi-agent MuJoCo benchmark, and a challenging set of StarCraft II micromanagement tasks. Empirical results demonstrate FACMAC's superior performance over MADDPG and other baselines on all three domains.
FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradients Bei Peng University of Liverpool T abish Rashid University of Oxford Christian A. Schroeder de Witt
However, unlike QMIX, there are no inherent constraints on factoring the critic. We thus also employ a nonmonotonic factorisation and empirically demonstrate that its increased representational capacity allows it to solve some tasks that cannot be solved with monolithic, or monotonically factored critics.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.41)
- Europe > Switzerland (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Delft (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents > Agent Societies (0.71)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.46)
FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradients
We propose FACtored Multi-Agent Centralised policy gradients (FACMAC), a new method for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning in both discrete and continuous action spaces. Like MADDPG, a popular multi-agent actor-critic method, our approach uses deep deterministic policy gradients to learn policies. However, FACMAC learns a centralised but factored critic, which combines per-agent utilities into the joint action-value function via a non-linear monotonic function, as in QMIX, a popular multi-agent Q -learning algorithm. However, unlike QMIX, there are no inherent constraints on factoring the critic. We thus also employ a nonmonotonic factorisation and empirically demonstrate that its increased representational capacity allows it to solve some tasks that cannot be solved with monolithic, or monotonically factored critics.
The Design and Realization of Multi-agent Obstacle Avoidance based on Reinforcement Learning
Zhao, Enyu, Liu, Chanjuan, Su, Houfu, Liu, Yang
Intelligence agents and multi-agent systems play important roles in scenes like the control system of grouped drones, and multi-agent navigation and obstacle avoidance which is the foundational function of advanced application has great importance. In multi-agent navigation and obstacle avoidance tasks, the decision-making interactions and dynamic changes of agents are difficult for traditional route planning algorithms or reinforcement learning algorithms with the increased complexity of the environment. The classical multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm, Multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient(MADDPG), solved precedent algorithms' problems of having unstationary training process and unable to deal with environment randomness. However, MADDPG ignored the temporal message hidden beneath agents' interaction with the environment. Besides, due to its CTDE technique which let each agent's critic network to calculate over all agents' action and the whole environment information, it lacks ability to scale to larger amount of agents. To deal with MADDPG's ignorance of the temporal information of the data, this article proposes a new algorithm called MADDPG-LSTMactor, which combines MADDPG with Long short term memory (LSTM). By using agent's observations of continuous timesteps as the input of its policy network, it allows the LSTM layer to process the hidden temporal message. Experimental result demonstrated that this algorithm had better performance in scenarios where the amount of agents is small. Besides, to solve MADDPG's drawback of not being efficient in scenarios where agents are too many, this article puts forward a light-weight MADDPG (MADDPG-L) algorithm, which simplifies the input of critic network. The result of experiments showed that this algorithm had better performance than MADDPG when the amount of agents was large.
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- Asia > China > Liaoning Province > Dalian (0.04)
- Asia > China > Heilongjiang Province > Harbin (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)