AI is nearly exclusively designed by men - here's how to fix it With the Trump administration's attacks on so-called woke AI it is becoming even harder to make the technology we use fairer and more diverse. It's day two of the conference at the Royal Society in London, but I'm finding it increasingly hard to concentrate on the speakers because my AI transcription software - which is supposed to make my life easier - keeps insisting on mistyping someone's name. The irony isn't lost on me: this is the session about artificial intelligence, and specifically about how women are being erased from the latest AI technologies. This is much bigger than the now-familiar idea that AI algorithms carry the biases of the datasets they are trained on, including gender bias. Instead, the focus of the conference session, chaired by computer scientist Wendy Hall, is seeking to address a more fundamental issue: the fact that new AI technologies, which will have a transformative effect on all of society, are being designed almost exclusively by men.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Exploration is one of the core challenges in reinforcement learning. A common formulation of curiosity-driven exploration uses the difference between the real future and the future predicted by a learned model. However, predicting the future is an inherently difficult task which can be ill-posed in the face of stochasticity. In this paper, we introduce an alternative form of curiosity that rewards novel associations between different senses. Our approach exploits multiple modalities to provide a stronger signal for more efficient exploration. Our method is inspired by the fact that, for humans, both sight and sound play a critical role in exploration.

New Scientist changed the UK's freedom of information laws in 2025 By requesting copies of the then-UK technology secretary's ChatGPT logs, New Scientist set a precedent for how freedom of information laws apply to chatbot interactions, helping to hold governments to account Our successful request for Peter Kyle's ChatGPT logs stunned observers When I fired off an email at the start of 2025, I hadn't intended to set a legal precedent for how the UK government handles its interactions with AI chatbots, but that is exactly what happened. It all began in January when I read an interview with the then-UK tech secretary Peter Kyle in . Trying to suggest he used first-hand the technology his department was set up to regulate, Kyle said that he would often have conversations with ChatGPT. AI may blunt our thinking skills - here's what you can do about it That got me wondering: could I obtain his chat history? Freedom of information (FOI) laws are often deployed to obtain emails and other documents produced by public bodies, but past precedent has suggested that some private data - such as search queries - aren't eligible for release in this way. I was interested to see which way the chatbot conversations would be categorised.

The AI bubble is heading towards a burst but it won't be the end of AI Economists, bankers and even the boss of OpenAI are warning of a rapidly inflating AI bubble. If and when it bursts, what will happen to the technological breakthroughs of the past few years? The hundreds of billions of dollars being spent on AI seem to have inflated a global financial bubble that's now fit to burst, leaving companies and investors at risk of holding vast debt that cannot be serviced by the meagre revenue brought in by current AI services. But what does that mean for the future of the technology underpinning this financial feeding frenzy? In recent weeks, warnings of a potential AI bubble have come from the International Monetary Fund, the Bank of England, the head of the largest US bank, and even OpenAI boss Sam Altman .

Paralysed man can feel objects through another person's hand Keith Thomas, a man in his 40s with no sensation or movement in his hands, is able to feel and move objects by controlling another person's hand via a brain implant. The technique might one day even allow us to experience another person's body over long distances. Keith Thomas (right) was able to control another person's hand A man with paralysis has been able to move and sense another person's hand as if it were his own, thanks to a new kind of "telepathic" brain implant. "We created a mind-body connection between two different individuals," says Chad Bouton at the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research in New York state. The approach could be used as a form of rehabilitation after spinal cord injury, allowing people with paralysis to work together, and may one day even allow people to share experiences remotely, says Bouton.

We're finally reading the secrets of Herculaneum's lost library A whole library's worth of papyri owned by Julius Caesar's father-in-law were turned to charcoal by the eruption of Vesuvius. Deep within a particle accelerator, theoretical physicist Giorgio Angelotti is hard at work. He sets a black cylinder on a mount, bolts it down, then runs through some safety checks before retreating from the chamber, known as "the hatch". "You have to be sure there's no one in the hatch before you close the door," he says. That's because he is about to blast the sample with a super-powerful beam of X-rays.

Are you terse and informal when speaking to an AI chatbot? Talking to an AI chatbot in less formal language, as many people do, reduces the accuracy of its responses - suggesting that either we need to be linguistically stricter when using a chatbot, or that the AIs need to be trained to better adapt to informality. Fulei Zhang and Zhou Yu at Amazon looked at how people begin conversations with human agents compared with a chatbot assistant powered by a large language model (LLM). They used the Claude 3.5 Sonnet model to score the conversations on a range of factors and found that people interacting with chatbots used less accurate grammar and were less polite than they were when addressing humans. They also used a slightly narrower range of vocabulary.

What makes a quantum computer good? Claims that one quantum computer is better than another rest on terms like quantum advantage or quantum supremacy, fault-tolerance or qubits with better coherence - what does it all mean? Eleven years ago, I was just getting a start on my PhD in theoretical physics, and to be honest with you I never thought about quantum computers, or writing about them, at all. Meanwhile, staff were hard at work putting together the world's first " Quantum computer buyer's guide " (we've always been ahead of the curve). Looking through it reveals what a different time it was - John Martinis at University of California, Santa Barbara got a shout out for working on an array of only nine qubits, and just last week he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics .

A timeline of genetic changes in millions of years of human evolution shows that variants linked to higher intelligence appeared most rapidly around 500,000 years ago, and were closely followed by mutations that made us more prone to mental illness. The findings suggest a "trade-off" in brain evolution between intelligence and psychiatric issues, says Ilan Libedinsky at the Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Why did humans evolve big brains? "Mutations related to psychiatric disorders apparently involve part of the genome that also involves intelligence. So there's an overlap there," says Libedinsky. "[The advances in cognition] may have come at the price of making our brains more vulnerable to mental disorders."