execution
Why physical AI is becoming manufacturing's next advantage
Why physical AI is becoming manufacturing's next advantage From simulation driven development to real world execution, Microsoft and NVIDIA are helping manufacturers leverage AI to cross the industrial frontier with confidence. For decades, manufacturers have pursued automation to drive efficiency, reduce costs, and stabilize operations. That approach delivered meaningful gains, but it is no longer enough. Today's manufacturing leaders face a different challenge: how to grow amid labor constraints, rising complexity, and increasing pressure to innovate faster without sacrificing safety, quality, or trust. The next phase of transformation will not be defined by isolated AI tools or individual robots, but by intelligence that can operate reliably in the physical world . This is where physical AI--intelligence that can sense, reason, and act in the real world--marks a decisive shift.
RMIX: LearningRisk-SensitivePoliciesfor CooperativeReinforcementLearningAgents
Current value-based multi-agent reinforcement learning methods optimize individual Q values to guide individuals' behaviours via centralized training with decentralized execution (CTDE). However, such expected, i.e., risk-neutral, Q value is not sufficient even with CTDE due to the randomness of rewards and the uncertainty in environments, which causes the failure of these methods to train coordinating agents incomplexenvironments. Toaddress these issues, we propose RMIX, anovelcooperativeMARL method with theConditional Value at Risk (CVaR) measure over the learned distributions of individuals' Q values. Specifically, we first learn the return distributions of individuals to analytically calculate CVaRfordecentralized execution. Then,tohandle thetemporal nature of the stochastic outcomes during executions, we propose a dynamic risk level predictorforriskleveltuning.
- North America > United States > Oregon (0.04)
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.48)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.93)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Urbana (0.04)
- Europe > Austria (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.68)
- Information Technology > Software Engineering (0.68)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.67)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel > Tel Aviv District > Tel Aviv (0.04)
- Antarctica (0.04)
- Education > Educational Setting > Online (0.47)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.46)
- Transportation > Air (0.40)
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.04)
- Africa > Sudan (0.04)
StrategyLLM: Large Language Models as Strategy Generators, Executors, Optimizers, and Evaluators for Problem Solving Chang Gao
It employs four LLM-based agents: strategy generator, executor, optimizer, and evaluator, working together to generate, evaluate, and select promising strategies for a given task. Experimental results demonstrate that StrategyLLM outperforms the competitive baseline CoT -SC that requires human-annotated solutions on 13 datasets across 4 challenging tasks without human involvement, including math reasoning (34.2%
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.05)
- Asia > Indonesia > Bali (0.04)
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Asia > South Korea > Seoul > Seoul (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria > Catanzaro Province > Catanzaro (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado > Boulder County > Boulder (0.04)
- Africa > Mali (0.04)
Group Fairness in Peer Review
Large conferences such as NeurIPS and AAAI serve as crossroads of various AI fields, since they attract submissions from a vast number of communities. However, in some cases, this has resulted in a poor reviewing experience for some communities, whose submissions get assigned to less qualified reviewers outside of their communities. An often-advocated solution is to break up any such large conference into smaller conferences, but this can lead to isolation of communities and harm interdisciplinary research.
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.15)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.04)