Our gifting experts are obsessively searching for holiday gifts that are unique, thoughtful and suitable for any budget. A vulnerability in some Netgear routers could allow an attacker with access to your network to run malicious commands on the device. Lance Whitney is a technology journalist with an IT background. He's written for TechRepublic, PCMag, Macworld, and Time, among others, He also teaches classes in AI, cybersecurity, and social media. Certain Netgear routers are vulnerable to security exploits.

Recent advances in deep learning optimization have unveiled two intriguing phenomena under large learning rates: Edge of Stability (EoS) and Progressive Sharpening (PS), challenging classical Gradient Descent (GD) analyses.

The study of Neural Tangent Kernels (NTKs) in deep learning has drawn increasing attention in recent years. NTKs typically actively change during training and are related to feature learning. In parallel, recent work on Gradient Descent (GD) has found a phenomenon called Edge of Stability (EoS), in which the largest eigenvalue of the NTK oscillates around a value inversely proportional to the step size. However, although follow-up works have explored the underlying mechanism of such eigenvalue behavior in depth, the understanding of the behavior of the NTK during EoS is still missing. This paper examines the dynamics of NTK eigenvectors during EoS in detail. Across different architectures, we observe that larger learning rates cause the leading eigenvectors of the final NTK, as well as the full NTK matrix, to have greater alignment with the training target. We then study the underlying mechanism of this phenomenon and provide a theoretical analysis for a two-layer linear network. Our study enhances the understanding of GD training dynamics in deep learning.

Existing analyses of the edge of stability (EoS) treat it as a global property of optimization. We show that it is also selective: the stability constraint redistributes learning across subsets of the training distribution, amplifying progress on some groups while suppressing progress on others. Using a branching intervention that enters or exits the EoS regime from the same training state, we causally demonstrate this trade-off and identify two necessary conditions for a group to benefit. First, its aggregate gradient must align with the top Hessian eigenvector. We isolate this mechanism with a controlled perturbation that preserves distance but randomizes direction, destroying alignment and eliminating the advantage. Second, the group must sustain non-vanishing gradient magnitude over time. Under cross-entropy loss, gradient saturation decouples confidently classified groups, shifting the advantage to output-outliers, whose gradients persist. Together, these results show that EoS functions not only as a stability boundary, but as a mechanism governing the allocation of learning across the data distribution.

In modern deep learning, weight decay is often credited with "stabilizing" training dynamics, diverging from its classical role as a static regularization penalty. We investigate a fundamental question: *does weight decay stabilize training dynamics, and if so, through which mechanism?* Indeed, training stability is understood through different but related notions in the literature. We consider how weight decay affects the parameter-space dynamics and loss sharpness by analyzing its effects at the \emph{Edge of Stability} (EoS). We show that weight decay robustly slows *progressive sharpening}. Furthermore, we uncover a striking architecture-dependent phase transition. In CNNs, weight decay dampens the oscillations at the EoS, while in MLPs, increasing weight decay causes a phase transition in which the sharpness stabilizes at a threshold significantly below the theoretical $\frac{2}η$ boundary. We develop a mathematical framework that accurately models these phenomena and identify the global alignment of the parameter vector and the sharpness gradient as the mechanistic driver of the phase transition. Importantly, we show that these phenomena translate into stability in terms of search in function-space (NTK). Last, this shows that curvature thresholds obtained from convex/quadratic heuristics may not be reliable stability diagnostics under regularization.

Are lasers the future of anti-drone warfare? A drone appears on the grainy, gray-scaled image of the thermal camera. This is the type of drone used by groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas and the Yemeni Houthis. Seconds later, the wing of the drone snaps off, sending it tumbling down, exploding when it hits the ground. This is a video shared by the Israeli Ministry of Defence and arms producer Rafael, a hint towards the future of anti-drone warfare.

Although using gated RNNs cells as feedforward networks is fairly non-standard, our primary motivation is to keep the AED and AO architectures as similar as possible in order to isolate the differences that arise from recurrence and positional encoding.

Humans can length-generalize in integer addition because they understand the essential principle of the task. Nevertheless, itisobserved that Transformers typically learn to solve addition only up to the training sequence length (Lee et al., 2024), which is different from thetruearithmetic algorithm thathumans "implement".

Autoregressive models (ARMs) currently constitute the dominant paradigm for large language models (LLMs). Energy-based models (EBMs) represent another class of models, which have historically been less prevalent in LLM development, yet naturally characterize the optimal policy in post-training alignment. In this paper, we provide a unified view of these two model classes. Taking the chain rule of probability as a starting point, we establish an explicit bijection between ARMs and EBMs in function space, which we show to correspond to a special case of the soft Bellman equation in maximum entropy reinforcement learning. Building upon this bijection, we derive the equivalence between supervised learning of ARMs and EBMs. Furthermore, we analyze the distillation of EBMs into ARMs by providing theoretical error bounds. Our results provide insights into the ability of ARMs to plan ahead, despite being based on the next-token prediction paradigm.