Motifs often recur in musical works in altered forms, preserving aspects of their identity while undergoing local variation. This paper investigates how such motivic transformations occur within their musical context in symbolic music. To support this analysis, we develop a probabilistic framework for modeling motivic transformations and apply it to Beethoven's piano sonatas by integrating multiple datasets that provide melodic, rhythmic, harmonic, and motivic information within a unified analytical representation. Motif transformations are represented as multilabel variables by comparing each motif instance to a designated reference occurrence within its local context, ensuring consistent labeling across transformation families. We introduce a multilabel Conditional Random Field to model how motif-level musical features influence the occurrence of transformations and how different transformation families tend to co-occur. Our goal is to provide an interpretable, distributional analysis of motivic transformation patterns, enabling the study of their structural relationships and stylistic variation. By linking computational modeling with music-theoretical interpretation, the proposed framework supports quantitative investigation of musical structure and complexity in symbolic corpora and may facilitate the analysis of broader compositional patterns and writing practices.

Prior research has found that differences in the early period of neural network training significantly impact the performance of in-distribution (ID) tasks. However, neural networks are often sensitive to out-of-distribution (OOD) data, making them less reliable in downstream applications. Yet, the impact of the early training period on OOD generalization remains understudied due to its complexity and lack of effective analytical methodologies. In this work, we investigate the relationship between learning dynamics and OOD generalization during the early period of neural network training. We utilize the trace of Fisher Information and sharpness, with a focus on gradual unfreezing (i.e. progressively unfreezing parameters during training) as the methodology for investigation. Through a series of empirical experiments, we show that 1) selecting the number of trainable parameters at different times during training, i.e. realized by gradual unfreezing -- has a minuscule impact on ID results, but greatly affects the generalization to OOD data; 2) the absolute values of sharpness and trace of Fisher Information at the initial period of training are not indicative for OOD generalization, but the relative values could be; 3) the trace of Fisher Information and sharpness may be used as indicators for the removal of interventions during early period of training for better OOD generalization.