Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents excel in solving complex decision-making tasks across various domains. However, they often require a substantial number of training steps and a vast experience replay buffer, leading to significant computational and resource demands. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel theoretical result that leverages the Neyman-Rubin potential outcomes framework into DRL. Unlike most methods that focus on bounding the counterfactual loss, we establish a causal bound on the factual loss, which is analogous to the on-policy loss in DRL. This bound is computed by storing past value network outputs in the experience replay buffer, effectively utilizing data that is usually discarded. Extensive experiments across the Atari 2600 and MuJoCo domains on various agents, such as DQN and SAC, achieve higher reward ratio, outperforming the same agents without our proposed term, and reducing the experience replay buffer size by, significantly improving .

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is critical for deploying machine learning models in the open world. To design scoring functions that discern OOD data from the in-distribution (ID) cases from a pre-trained discriminative model, existing methods tend to make rigorous distributional assumptions either explicitly or implicitly due to the lack of knowledge about the learned feature space in advance. The mismatch between the learned and assumed distributions motivates us to raise a fundamental yet under-explored question: \textit{Is it possible to deterministically model the feature distribution while pre-training a discriminative model?}This paper gives an affirmative answer to this question by presenting a Distributional Representation Learning (\texttt{DRL}) framework for OOD detection. In particular, \texttt{DRL} explicitly enforces the underlying feature space to conform to a pre-defined mixture distribution, together with an online approximation of normalization constants to enable end-to-end training. Furthermore, we formulate \texttt{DRL} into a provably convergent Expectation-Maximization algorithm to avoid trivial solutions and rearrange the sequential sampling to guide the training consistency. Extensive evaluations across mainstream OOD detection benchmarks empirically manifest the superiority of the proposed \texttt{DRL} over its advanced counterparts.

Based on our framework, we also present a hybrid of DRL and EMalgorithms thathasaguaranteed convergencerate.

Effective intersection control can play an important role in reducing traffic congestion and associated vehicular emissions.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms and evolution strategies (ES) have been applied to various tasks, showing excellent performances. These have the opposite properties, with DRL having good sample efficiency and poor stability, while ES being vice versa. Recently, there have been attempts to combine these algorithms, but these methods fully rely on synchronous update scheme, making it not ideal to maximize the benefits of the parallelism in ES. To solve this challenge, asynchronous update scheme was introduced, which is capable of good time-efficiency and diverse policy exploration. In this paper, we introduce an Asynchronous Evolution Strategy-Reinforcement Learning (AES-RL) that maximizes the parallel efficiency of ES and integrates it with policy gradient methods. Specifically, we propose 1) a novel framework to merge ES and DRL asynchronously and 2) various asynchronous update methods that can take all advantages of asynchronism, ES, and DRL, which are exploration and time efficiency, stability, and sample efficiency, respectively. The proposed framework and update methods are evaluated in continuous control benchmark work, showing superior performance as well as time efficiency compared to the previous methods.

The double descent (DD) paradox, where over-parameterized models see generalization improve past the interpolation point, remains largely unexplored in the non-stationary domain of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL). We present preliminary evidence that DD exists in model-free DRL, investigating it systematically across varying model capacity using the Actor-Critic framework. We rely on an information-theoretic metric, Policy Entropy, to measure policy uncertainty throughout training. Preliminary results show a clear epoch-wise DD curve; the policy's entrance into the second descent region correlates with a sustained, significant reduction in Policy Entropy. This entropic decay suggests that over-parameterization acts as an implicit regularizer, guiding the policy towards robust, flatter minima in the loss landscape. These findings establish DD as a factor in DRL and provide an information-based mechanism for designing agents that are more general, transferable, and robust.

In this paper, we study the use of robust model independent bounded extremum seeking (ES) feedback control to improve the robustness of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) controllers for a class of nonlinear time-varying systems. DRL has the potential to learn from large datasets to quickly control or optimize the outputs of many-parameter systems, but its performance degrades catastrophically when the system model changes rapidly over time. Bounded ES can handle time-varying systems with unknown control directions, but its convergence speed slows down as the number of tuned parameters increases and, like all local adaptive methods, it can get stuck in local minima. We demonstrate that together, DRL and bounded ES result in a hybrid controller whose performance exceeds the sum of its parts with DRL taking advantage of historical data to learn how to quickly control a many-parameter system to a desired setpoint while bounded ES ensures its robustness to time variations. We present a numerical study of a general time-varying system and a combined ES-DRL controller for automatic tuning of the Low Energy Beam Transport section at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center linear particle accelerator.

We are glad that our reviewers agree on the merits and relevance of our work. R3/R4: Applying Freeze-Thaw BO in the settings considered. See Figure 1 for further illustration of why FT struggles in DRL settings. Fabolas uses a different way of obtaining low-fidelity information. R3: Sec 3.2 and 3.3 should be reversed as Sec 3.2 makes reference to Eq (7).

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/