Answer set programs (ASP) with external evaluations are a declarative means to capture advanced applications. However, their evaluation can be expensive due to external source accesses. In this paper we consider HEX-programs that provide external atoms as a bidirectional interface to external sources and present a novel evaluation method based on support sets, which informally are portions of the input to an external atom that will determine its output for any completion of the partial input. Support sets allow one to shortcut the external source access, which can be completely eliminated. This is particularly attractive if a compact representation of suitable support sets is efficiently constructible. We discuss some applications with this property, among them description logic programs over DL-Lite ontologies, and present experimental results showing that support sets can significantly improve efficiency.

Fages [1994] introduces the notion of well-supportedness as a key requirement for the semantics of normal logic programs and characterizes the standard answer set semantics in terms of the well-supportedness condition. With the property of well-supportedness, answer sets are guaranteed to be free of circular justifications. In this paper, we extend Fages’ work to description logic programs (or DL-programs). We introduce two forms of well-supportedness for DL-programs. The first one defines weakly well-supported models that are free of circular justifications caused by positive literals in rule bodies. The second one defines strongly well-supported models that are free of circular justifications caused by either positive or negative literals. We then define two new answer set semantics for DL-programs and characterize them in terms of the weakly and strongly well-supported models, respectively. The first semantics is based on an extended Gelfond-Lifschitz transformation and defines weakly well-supported answer sets that are free of circular justifications for the class of DL-programs without negative dl-atoms. The second semantics defines strongly well-supported answer sets which are free of circular justifications for all DL-programs. We show that the existing answer set semantics for DL-programs, such as the weak answer set semantics, the strong answer set semantics, and the FLP-based answer set semantics, satisfy neither the weak nor the strong well-supportedness condition, even for DL-programs without negative dl-atoms. This explains why their answer sets incur circular justifications.