directional sensor network
- North America > United States (0.14)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- Information Technology > Communications > Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.96)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
A Radius of Robust Feasibility Approach to Directional Sensors in Uncertain Terrain
A sensor has the ability to probe its surroundings. However, uncertainties in its exact location can significantly compromise its sensing performance. The radius of robust feasibility defines the maximum range within which robust feasibility is ensured. This work introduces a novel approach integrating it with the directional sensor networks to enhance coverage using a distributed greedy algorithm. In particular, we provide an exact formula for the radius of robust feasibility of sensors in a directional sensor network. The proposed model strategically orients the sensors in regions with high coverage potential, accounting for robustness in the face of uncertainty. We analyze the algorithm's adaptability in dynamic environments, demonstrating its ability to enhance efficiency and robustness. Experimental results validate its efficacy in maximizing coverage and optimizing sensor orientations, highlighting its practical advantages for real-world scenarios.
- Asia > India > West Bengal > Kharagpur (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Research Report (1.00)
- Overview (0.87)
- Information Technology > Communications > Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.96)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
Review for NeurIPS paper: Learning Multi-Agent Coordination for Enhancing Target Coverage in Directional Sensor Networks
Weaknesses: 1) The task of enhancing the target coverage in Directional Sensor Networks (DSNs) is important and challenging. However, as far as I am concerned, it is not a standard benchmark environment for studying multi-agent reinforcement learning. The proposed method/model design targets at a specific problem, limiting its significance. There already exist some popular environments for multi-agent cooperation. If experiments are conducted on these standard benchmarks, the significance of this work for the machine learning (ML) or reinforcement learning (RL) community can be improved.
Review for NeurIPS paper: Learning Multi-Agent Coordination for Enhancing Target Coverage in Directional Sensor Networks
This paper proposes multi-agent hierarchical RL method to the target coverage problems in directional sensor networks. Empirical results are provided to show the advantage of their method against state of the art MARL algorithms as well as optimization techniques specific to the target coverage problem. There are some concerns among the reviewers regarding whether RL is the right tool for the problem, insufficient comparison with non-learning heuristics, and the value of the work to the RL community. I share the first reviewer's positive sentiment on the application of RL to sensor networks. It is nice to see RL moving from games to real-world applications.
Learning Multi-Agent Coordination for Enhancing Target Coverage in Directional Sensor Networks
Maximum target coverage by adjusting the orientation of distributed sensors is an important problem in directional sensor networks (DSNs). This problem is challenging as the targets usually move randomly but the coverage range of sensors is limited in angle and distance. Thus, it is required to coordinate sensors to get ideal target coverage with low power consumption, e.g. To realize this, we propose a Hierarchical Target-oriented Multi-Agent Coordination (HiT-MAC), which decomposes the target coverage problem into two-level tasks: targets assignment by a coordinator and tracking assigned targets by executors. Specifically, the coordinator periodically monitors the environment globally and allocates targets to each executor.
Learning Multi-Agent Coordination for Enhancing Target Coverage in Directional Sensor Networks
Xu, Jing, Zhong, Fangwei, Wang, Yizhou
Maximum target coverage by adjusting the orientation of distributed sensors is an important problem in directional sensor networks (DSNs). This problem is challenging as the targets usually move randomly but the coverage range of sensors is limited in angle and distance. Thus, it is required to coordinate sensors to get ideal target coverage with low power consumption, e.g. no missing targets or reducing redundant coverage. To realize this, we propose a Hierarchical Target-oriented Multi-Agent Coordination (HiT-MAC), which decomposes the target coverage problem into two-level tasks: targets assignment by a coordinator and tracking assigned targets by executors. Specifically, the coordinator periodically monitors the environment globally and allocates targets to each executor. In turn, the executor only needs to track its assigned targets. To effectively learn the HiT-MAC by reinforcement learning, we further introduce a bunch of practical methods, including a self-attention module, marginal contribution approximation for the coordinator, goal-conditional observation filter for the executor, etc. Empirical results demonstrate the advantage of HiT-MAC in coverage rate, learning efficiency,and scalability, comparing to baselines. We also conduct an ablative analysis on the effectiveness of the introduced components in the framework.
- North America > United States (0.14)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- Information Technology > Communications > Networks > Sensor Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)