In exploratory data analysis of known classes of high dimensional data, a central question is how distinct are the classes? The Direction Projection Permutation (DiProPerm) hypothesis test provides an answer to this that is directly connected to a visual analysis of the data. In this paper, we propose an improved DiProPerm test that solves 3 major challenges of the original version. First, we implement only balanced permutations to increase the test power for data with strong signals. Second, our mathematical analysis leads to an adjustment to correct the null behavior of both balanced and the conventional all permutations. Third, new confidence intervals (reflecting permutation variation) for test significance are also proposed for comparison of results across different contexts. This improvement of DiProPerm inference is illustrated in the context of comparing cancer types in examples from The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Advancements in modern technology and computer software have dramatically increased the demand and feasibility to collect high-dimensional data sets. Such data possess challenges which require the creation of new and adaptation of existing statistical methods. One such challenge is that we may observe many more predictors, p, than the number of observations, n, especially in small sample size studies. These data structures are known as high-dimensional, low sample size (HDLSS) data sets, or "small n, big p ". HDLSS data emerge frequently in many health-related fields. For example, in genomic studies, a single microarray experiment might produce tens of thousands of gene expressions compared to the few samples studied, often being less than a hundred (Alag, 2019).

Classification and clustering are both important topics in statistical learning. A natural question herein is whether predefined classes are really different from one another, or whether clusters are really there. Specifically, we may be interested in knowing whether the two classes defined by some class labels (when they are provided), or the two clusters tagged by a clustering algorithm (where class labels are not provided), are from the same underlying distribution. Although both are challenging questions for the high-dimensional, low-sample size data, there has been some recent development for both. However, when it is costly to manually place labels on observations, it is often that only a small portion of the class labels is available. In this article, we propose a significance analysis approach for such type of data, namely partially labeled data. Our method makes use of the whole data and tries to test the class difference as if all the labels were observed. Compared to a testing method that ignores the label information, our method provides a greater power, meanwhile, maintaining the size, illustrated by a comprehensive simulation study. Theoretical properties of the proposed method are studied with emphasis on the high-dimensional, low-sample size setting. Our simulated examples help to understand when and how the information extracted from the labeled data can be effective. A real data example further illustrates the usefulness of the proposed method.