We prove optimal sampling bounds achieving $(1\pm\varepsilon)$-relative error for a broad class of Lipschitz continuous classification loss functions under various regularization terms. This includes important functions such as logistic and sigmoid loss, hinge loss, and ReLU loss, as prominent and popular representative examples. In particular, we prove $k^2/\varepsilon^2$ upper and lower bounds for $\|\cdot\|_2/k$ regularization, and $k/\varepsilon^2$ upper and lower bounds for $\|\cdot\|_1/k$ regularization. For $\|\cdot\|_2^2/k$ regularization, the sampling complexity depends mainly on a bounded derivative property: if $|g'(x)|\leq g(x)$, and $g(0)>0$, and $g$ is monotonic or convex, then it admits linear in $k$ sampling complexity; otherwise the general bound is $k^2/\varepsilon^2$. However, if $g(0)=0$, our results indicate that no dimension-free bounds are possible, and even sublinear bounds are ruled out. All upper bounds are complemented by matching lower bounds up to polylogarithmic terms. Moreover, our work relies conceptually and algorithmically on simple uniform or (squared) norm sampling and hereby improves over recent cubic $k^3/\varepsilon^2$ sensitivity sampling bounds of (Alishahi and Phillips, ICML'24). This is achieved by refined arguments involving higher moment bounds and empirical process analyses to avoid overcounting that appears in the de-facto standard VC-dimension and sensitivity framework.

While deep learning has revolutionised inverse problems, its safe deployment is hindered by three primary reliability concerns: hallucinations, instabilities, and performance volatility [48]. Hallucinations manifest as high-fidelity features that are factually false; instabilities reflect heightened sensitivity to measurement noise; and performance volatility refers to significant fluctuations in reconstruction quality across the data, yielding high-fidelity results for some samples while failing on seemingly similar images. In many applications, the risk of generating realistic but unfaithful content can impede the safe deployment of AI methods for inverse problems. The choice of "hallucinate" as the Cambridge Dictionary's word of the year in 2023 illustrates this open problem [53]. The problem of AI hallucinations persists, as the Financial Times [44] highlighted that, "AI hallucinations haunt users more than job losses." A first step toward training AI methods that do not suffer from hallucinations is the assessment and identification of hallucinated outputs. Consider the inverse problem of recovering xfrom noisy measurements y " Fpx,eq, x PM1 ĂX, e PEĂY, (1.1)

There is a road and there are many atoms and trees beside it and there is a building in the right corner.

We present an algorithm based on posterior sampling (aka Thompson sampling) that achieves near-optimal worst-case regret bounds when the underlying Markov Decision Process (MDP) is communicating with a finite, though unknown, diameter. Our main result is a high probability regret upper bound of $\tilde{O}(D\sqrt{SAT})$ for any communicating MDP with $S$ states, $A$ actions and diameter $D$, when $T\ge S^5A$. Here, regret compares the total reward achieved by the algorithm to the total expected reward of an optimal infinite-horizon undiscounted average reward policy, in time horizon $T$. This result improves over the best previously known upper bound of $\tilde{O}(DS\sqrt{AT})$ achieved by any algorithm in this setting, and matches the dependence on $S$ in the established lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{DSAT})$ for this problem. Our techniques involve proving some novel results about the anti-concentration of Dirichlet distribution, which may be of independent interest.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Reinforcement learning (RL) [1] studies the problem of learning in sequential decision-making problems where the dynamics of the environment is unknown, but can be learnt by performing actions andobserving their outcome inanonline fashion. Asample-efficient RLagent must trade off the explorationneeded to collect information about the environment, and theexploitation of the experience gathered so far to gain as much reward as possible.