Human-object interaction (HOI) detection aims to comprehend the intricate relationships between humans and objects, predicting triplets, and serving as the foundation for numerous computer vision tasks. The complexity and diversity of human-object interactions in the real world, however, pose significant challenges for both annotation and recognition, particularly in recognizing interactions within an open world context. This study explores the universal interaction recognition in an open-world setting through the use of Vision-Language (VL) foundation models and large language models (LLMs). The proposed method is dubbed as UniHOI. We conduct a deep analysis of the three hierarchical features inherent in visual HOI detectors and propose a method for high-level relation extraction aimed at VL foundation models, which we call HO prompt-based learning.

The scientific study of the Solar System's minor bodies ultimately starts with a search for those bodies. This chapter presents a review of the use of machine learning techniques to find moving objects, both natural and artificial, in astronomical imagery. After a short review of the classical non-machine learning techniques that are historically used, I review the relatively nascent machine learning literature, which can broadly be summarized into three categories: streak detection, detection of moving point sources in image sequences, and detection of moving sources in shift and stack searches. In most cases, convolutional neural networks are utilized, which is the obvious choice given the imagery nature of the inputs. In this chapter I present two example networks: a Residual Network I designed which is in use in various shift and stack searches, and a convolutional neural network that was designed for prediction of source brightnesses and their uncertainties in those same shift-stacks. In discussion of the literature and example networks, I discuss various pitfalls with the use of machine learning techniques, including a discussion on the important issue of overfitting. I discuss various pitfall associated with the use of machine learning techniques, and what I consider best practices to follow in the application of machine learning to a new problem, including methods for the creation of robust training sets, validation, and training to avoid overfitting.

Group testing is an approach aimed at identifying up to $d$ defective items among a total of $n$ elements. This is accomplished by examining subsets to determine if at least one defective item is present. In our study, we focus on the problem of identifying a subset of $\ell\leq d$ defective items. We develop upper and lower bounds on the number of tests required to detect $\ell$ defective items in both the adaptive and non-adaptive settings while considering scenarios where no prior knowledge of $d$ is available, and situations where an estimate of $d$ or at least some non-trivial upper bound on $d$ is available. When no prior knowledge on $d$ is available, we prove a lower bound of $ \Omega(\frac{\ell \log^2n}{\log \ell +\log\log n})$ tests in the randomized non-adaptive settings and an upper bound of $O(\ell \log^2 n)$ for the same settings. Furthermore, we demonstrate that any non-adaptive deterministic algorithm must ask $\Theta(n)$ tests, signifying a fundamental limitation in this scenario. For adaptive algorithms, we establish tight bounds in different scenarios. In the deterministic case, we prove a tight bound of $\Theta(\ell\log{(n/\ell)})$. Moreover, in the randomized settings, we derive a tight bound of $\Theta(\ell\log{(n/d)})$. When $d$, or at least some non-trivial estimate of $d$, is known, we prove a tight bound of $\Theta(d\log (n/d))$ for the deterministic non-adaptive settings, and $\Theta(\ell\log(n/d))$ for the randomized non-adaptive settings. In the adaptive case, we present an upper bound of $O(\ell \log (n/\ell))$ for the deterministic settings, and a lower bound of $\Omega(\ell\log(n/d)+\log n)$. Additionally, we establish a tight bound of $\Theta(\ell \log(n/d))$ for the randomized adaptive settings.

The study of point cloud data sampled from a stratification, a collection of manifolds with possible different dimensions, is pursued in this paper. We present a technique for simultaneously soft clustering and estimating the mixed dimensionality and density of such structures. The framework is based on a maximum likelihood estimation of a Poisson mixture model. The presentation of the approach is completed with artificial and real examples demonstrating the importance of extending manifold learning to stratification learning.

Pneumonia, a respiratory infection brought on by bacteria or viruses, affects a large number of people, especially in developing and impoverished countries where high levels of pollution, unclean living conditions, and overcrowding are frequently observed, along with insufficient medical infrastructure. Pleural effusion, a condition in which fluids fill the lung and complicate breathing, is brought on by pneumonia. Early detection of pneumonia is essential for ensuring curative care and boosting survival rates. The approach most usually used to diagnose pneumonia is chest X-ray imaging. The purpose of this work is to develop a method for the automatic diagnosis of bacterial and viral pneumonia in digital x-ray pictures. This article first presents the authors' technique, and then gives a comprehensive report on recent developments in the field of reliable diagnosis of pneumonia. In this study, here tuned a state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural network to classify plant diseases based on images and tested its performance. Deep learning architecture is compared empirically. VGG19, ResNet with 152v2, Resnext101, Seresnet152, Mobilenettv2, and DenseNet with 201 layers are among the architectures tested. Experiment data consists of two groups, sick and healthy X-ray pictures. To take appropriate action against plant diseases as soon as possible, rapid disease identification models are preferred. DenseNet201 has shown no overfitting or performance degradation in our experiments, and its accuracy tends to increase as the number of epochs increases. Further, DenseNet201 achieves state-of-the-art performance with a significantly a smaller number of parameters and within a reasonable computing time. This architecture outperforms the competition in terms of testing accuracy, scoring 95%. Each architecture was trained using Keras, using Theano as the backend.

This blog posts looks at using Apache Groovy with the Deep Java Library (DJL) and backed by the Apache MXNet engine to detect objects within an image. Deep learning falls under the branches of machine learning and artificial intelligence. It involves multiple layers (hence the "deep") of an artificial neural network. There are lots of ways to configure such networks and the details are beyond the scope of this blog post, but we can give some basic details. We will have four input nodes corresponding to the measurements of our four characteristics.

Those of us in the technology sector are quick to celebrate advances in artificial intelligence (AI). From applications that can detect fraudulent transactions to those that can predict disease progression, AI is poised to optimize business automation processes and drive powerful research breakthroughs. So why is it that a 2021 survey by the Pew Research Center found that a greater share of Americans reported being "more concerned than excited" about AI's increasing presence, and how can our community address this? Aside from the proverbial fear of job loss (and I, Robot uprisings), public mistrust of AI stems from the field's lack of ethical oversight. Professor Frank Rudzicz of the University of Toronto and the Vector Institute outlines the three biggest ethical concerns for AI today: First, what AI is actually used for may not be what we intended; second, access to AI is not always equal; and lastly, AI can very easily adopt and amplify unconscious human biases in our society.

For CT pulmonary angiograms, a scout view obtained in anterior–posterior projection is usually used for planning. For bolus tracking the radiographer manually locates a position in the CT scout view where the pulmonary trunk will be visible in an axial CT pre-scan. We automate the task of localizing the pulmonary trunk in CT scout views by deep learning methods. In 620 eligible CT scout views of 563 patients between March 2003 and February 2020 the region of the pulmonary trunk as well as an optimal slice (“reference standard”) for bolus tracking, in which the pulmonary trunk was clearly visible, was annotated and used to train a U-Net predicting the region of the pulmonary trunk in the CT scout view. The networks’ performance was subsequently evaluated on 239 CT scout views from 213 patients and was compared with the annotations of three radiographers. The network was able to localize the region of the pulmonary trunk with high accuracy, yielding an accuracy of 97.5% of localizing a slice in the region of the pulmonary trunk on the validation cohort. On average, the selected position had a distance of 5.3 mm from the reference standard. Compared to radiographers, using a non-inferiority test (one-sided, paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test) the network performed as well as each radiographer (P < 0.001 in all cases). Automated localization of the region of the pulmonary trunk in CT scout views is possible with high accuracy and is non-inferior to three radiographers.

In our latest work, "Detection of anemia from retinal fundus images via deep learning" published in "Nature Biomedical Engineering" we find that a deep learning model can quantify hemoglobin using de-identified photographs of the back of the eye and common metadata (e.g. Compared to just using metadata, deep learning improved the detection of anemia (as measured using the AUC), from 74 percent to 88 percent. To ensure these promising findings were not the result of chance or false correlations, other scientists helped to validate the model--which was initially developed on a dataset of primarily Caucasian ancestry--on a separate dataset from Asia. The performance of the model was similar on both datasets, suggesting the model could be useful in a variety of settings.

Imagine feeling very happy and excited one second. You feel like you have unlimited energy and you can take over the world!!! Then imagine feeling sad and depressed the very next second. You feel like there is no point in doing anything and may even feel suicidal. And then feeling happy and excited again. Are you wondering what this is?