crowdworker
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
cbeaff878d6446ed06c3e0ffa53477f2-Supplemental-Datasets_and_Benchmarks_Track.pdf
A.1 Motivation For what purpose was the dataset created? Who created the dataset (e.g., which team, research group) and on behalf of which entity (e.g., Who funded the creation of the dataset? What do the instances that comprise the dataset represent (e.g., documents, photos, people, How many instances are there in total (of each type, if appropriate)? The SRFUND dataset contains all possible instances. What data does each instance consist of?
- Law (0.46)
- Government (0.46)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
We thank all of the reviewers for their thoughtful feedback, and will incorporate their suggestions into the next version
We thank R1 for their comments and will emphasize the broader implications of our work on model explainability. R2 asked to contrast using (i) influence functions to measure the importance of training points with (ii) existing These papers address a different problem setting from ours and their methods are correspondingly distinct. Despite their differences, these methods could be complementary, as R2 suggested. We will include this discussion and we thank R2 for pointing it out. R3 asked if our empirical findings hold for non-convex models.
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Consumer Products & Services > Restaurants (0.47)
- Government > Regional Government (0.46)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- North America > United States > Oregon (0.04)
- Europe > Monaco (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Law (0.93)
- Law Enforcement & Public Safety > Crime Prevention & Enforcement (0.68)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Psychiatry/Psychology > Mental Health (0.46)
Supplementary materials: Video compression dataset and benchmark of learning-based video-quality metrics Anastasia Antsiferova
Below we describe the steps for calculating metrics. To avoid overfitting on our dataset, we used already fitted image-and video-quality-assessment models with public source code. Below are the steps for calculating different versions of such metrics. We used mean temporal pooling as a way to aggregate scores from multiple frames. We intend to include more data on this research in future publications.
cbeaff878d6446ed06c3e0ffa53477f2-Supplemental-Datasets_and_Benchmarks_Track.pdf
A.1 Motivation For what purpose was the dataset created? Who created the dataset (e.g., which team, research group) and on behalf of which entity (e.g., Who funded the creation of the dataset? What do the instances that comprise the dataset represent (e.g., documents, photos, people, How many instances are there in total (of each type, if appropriate)? The SRFUND dataset contains all possible instances. What data does each instance consist of?
- Law (0.46)
- Information Technology (0.46)
- Government (0.46)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- North America > United States > Oregon (0.04)
- Europe > Monaco (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Law (0.93)
- Law Enforcement & Public Safety > Crime Prevention & Enforcement (0.68)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Psychiatry/Psychology > Mental Health (0.46)